[PATCH v5 15/17] KVM: arm64: Remove PtrAuth guest vcpu flag
Fuad Tabba
tabba at google.com
Mon Dec 16 02:50:55 PST 2024
The vcpu flag GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH is always associated with the
vcpu PtrAuth features, which are defined per vm rather than per
vcpu.
Remove the flag, and replace it with checks for the features
instead.
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 5 -----
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++----
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 13 -------------
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 4 ----
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 6602a4c091ac..406e99a452bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -691,9 +691,4 @@ static inline bool guest_hyp_sve_traps_enabled(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return __guest_hyp_cptr_xen_trap_enabled(vcpu, ZEN);
}
-
-static inline void kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH);
-}
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 69cb88c9ce3e..e6be8fe6627a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -866,10 +866,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define GUEST_HAS_SVE __vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(0))
/* SVE config completed */
#define VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED __vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(1))
-/* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
-#define GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH __vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(2))
/* KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT completed */
-#define VCPU_INITIALIZED __vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(3))
+#define VCPU_INITIALIZED __vcpu_single_flag(cflags, BIT(2))
/* Exception pending */
#define PENDING_EXCEPTION __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(0))
@@ -965,7 +963,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) \
((cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH) || \
cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH)) && \
- vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH))
+ (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) || \
+ vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC)))
#else
#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) false
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index 956385ee4aa2..b399d69b4b67 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -278,18 +278,6 @@ static void pkvm_init_features_from_host(struct pkvm_hyp_vm *hyp_vm, const struc
allowed_features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
}
-static void pkvm_vcpu_init_ptrauth(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu)
-{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &hyp_vcpu->vcpu;
-
- if (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) ||
- vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC)) {
- kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu);
- } else {
- vcpu_clear_flag(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu, GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH);
- }
-}
-
static void unpin_host_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *host_vcpu)
{
if (host_vcpu)
@@ -359,7 +347,6 @@ static int init_pkvm_hyp_vcpu(struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *hyp_vcpu,
goto done;
pkvm_vcpu_init_sve(hyp_vcpu, host_vcpu);
- pkvm_vcpu_init_ptrauth(hyp_vcpu);
done:
if (ret)
unpin_host_vcpu(host_vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index 470524b31951..1cfab6a5d8a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -211,10 +211,6 @@ void kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kvm_vcpu_reset_sve(vcpu);
}
- if (vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_ADDRESS) ||
- vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PTRAUTH_GENERIC))
- kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(vcpu);
-
if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
else if (vcpu_has_nv(vcpu))
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list