[PATCH 11/14] selftests/mm: Use sys_pkey helpers consistently
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev at linux.ibm.com
Sun Dec 15 14:09:27 PST 2024
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:50:16AM +0000, Kevin Brodsky wrote:
Hi Kevin, Andrew,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> index 814b17a43385..1f0743d9459d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile
> @@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ TEST_FILES += write_hugetlb_memory.sh
>
> include ../lib.mk
>
> -$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): vm_util.c thp_settings.c
> -$(TEST_GEN_FILES): vm_util.c thp_settings.c
> +$(TEST_GEN_PROGS): vm_util.c thp_settings.c pkey_util.c
> +$(TEST_GEN_FILES): vm_util.c thp_settings.c pkey_util.c
This patch breaks s390 in -next with the below error messages:
In file included from pkey_util.c:5:
pkey-helpers.h:109:2: error: #error Architecture not supported
109 | #error Architecture not supported
| ^~~~~
pkey-helpers.h: In function ‘set_pkey_bits’:
pkey-helpers.h:126:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pkey_bit_position’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
126 | u32 shift = pkey_bit_position(pkey);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pkey-helpers.h: In function ‘_read_pkey_reg’:
pkey-helpers.h:151:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__read_pkey_reg’; did you mean ‘_read_pkey_reg’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
151 | u64 pkey_reg = __read_pkey_reg();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| _read_pkey_reg
pkey-helpers.h: In function ‘write_pkey_reg’:
pkey-helpers.h:165:18: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
165 | dprintf4("%s() changing %016llx to %016llx\n", __func__,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
166 | __read_pkey_reg(), pkey_reg);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
pkey-helpers.h:62:32: note: in definition of macro ‘dprintf_level’
62 | sigsafe_printf(args); \
| ^~~~
pkey-helpers.h:165:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘dprintf4’
165 | dprintf4("%s() changing %016llx to %016llx\n", __func__,
| ^~~~~~~~
pkey-helpers.h:165:39: note: format string is defined here
165 | dprintf4("%s() changing %016llx to %016llx\n", __func__,
| ~~~~~~^
| |
| long long unsigned int
| %016x
pkey-helpers.h:169:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__write_pkey_reg’; did you mean ‘write_pkey_reg’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
169 | __write_pkey_reg(pkey_reg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| write_pkey_reg
pkey-helpers.h:171:18: warning: format ‘%llx’ expects argument of type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘int’ [-Wformat=]
171 | dprintf4("%s(%016llx) pkey_reg: %016llx\n", __func__,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
172 | pkey_reg, __read_pkey_reg());
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| int
pkey-helpers.h:62:32: note: in definition of macro ‘dprintf_level’
62 | sigsafe_printf(args); \
| ^~~~
pkey-helpers.h:171:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘dprintf4’
171 | dprintf4("%s(%016llx) pkey_reg: %016llx\n", __func__,
| ^~~~~~~~
pkey-helpers.h:171:47: note: format string is defined here
171 | dprintf4("%s(%016llx) pkey_reg: %016llx\n", __func__,
| ~~~~~~^
| |
| long long unsigned int
| %016x
pkey-helpers.h: In function ‘is_pkeys_supported’:
pkey-helpers.h:207:14: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_has_pkeys’; did you mean ‘kernel_has_pkeys’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
207 | if (!cpu_has_pkeys()) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| kernel_has_pkeys
Please, let me know if I am missing something.
> $(OUTPUT)/uffd-stress: uffd-common.c
> $(OUTPUT)/uffd-unit-tests: uffd-common.c
Thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list