[PATCH v5 2/3] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Add ti,lvds-vod-swing optional properties

Andrej Picej andrej.picej at norik.com
Thu Dec 12 02:38:22 PST 2024



On 12. 12. 24 10:28, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 09:08:03AM +0100, Andrej Picej wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12. 12. 24 00:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 08:57:17AM +0100, Andrej Picej wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10. 12. 24 14:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 02:41:01PM +0100, Andrej Picej wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10. 12. 24 12:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:19:00AM +0100, Andrej Picej wrote:
>>>>>>>> Add a optional properties to change LVDS output voltage. This should not
>>>>>>>> be static as this depends mainly on the connected display voltage
>>>>>>>> requirement. We have three properties:
>>>>>>>> - "ti,lvds-termination-ohms", which sets near end termination,
>>>>>>>> - "ti,lvds-vod-swing-data-microvolt" and
>>>>>>>> - "ti,lvds-vod-swing-clock-microvolt" which both set LVDS differential
>>>>>>>> output voltage for data and clock lanes. They are defined as an array
>>>>>>>> with min and max values. The appropriate bitfield will be set if
>>>>>>>> selected constraints can be met.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If "ti,lvds-termination-ohms" is not defined the default of 200 Ohm near
>>>>>>>> end termination will be used. Selecting only one:
>>>>>>>> "ti,lvds-vod-swing-data-microvolt" or
>>>>>>>> "ti,lvds-vod-swing-clock-microvolt" can be done, but the output voltage
>>>>>>>> constraint for only data/clock lanes will be met. Setting both is
>>>>>>>> recommended.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej at norik.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>>>>>> - specify default values in sn65dsi83_parse_lvds_endpoint,
>>>>>>>> - move sn65dsi83_parse_lvds_endpoint for channel B up, outside if,
>>>>>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>>>>>> - fix typo in commit message bitfiled -> bitfield
>>>>>>>> - use arrays (lvds_vod_swing_conf and lvds_term_conf) in private data, instead
>>>>>>>> of separate variables for channel A/B
>>>>>>>> - add more checks on return value of "of_property_read_u32_array"
>>>>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>>>>> - use microvolts for default array values 1000 mV -> 1000000 uV.
>>>>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>>>> - use datasheet tables to get the proper configuration
>>>>>>>> - since major change was done change the authorship to myself
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>      drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>>      1 file changed, 139 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
>>>>>>>> index 57a7ed13f996..f9578b38da28 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi83.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -132,6 +132,16 @@
>>>>>>>>      #define  REG_IRQ_STAT_CHA_SOT_BIT_ERR		BIT(2)
>>>>>>>>      #define  REG_IRQ_STAT_CHA_PLL_UNLOCK		BIT(0)
>>>>>>>> +enum sn65dsi83_channel {
>>>>>>>> +	CHANNEL_A,
>>>>>>>> +	CHANNEL_B
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +enum sn65dsi83_lvds_term {
>>>>>>>> +	OHM_100,
>>>>>>>> +	OHM_200
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>      enum sn65dsi83_model {
>>>>>>>>      	MODEL_SN65DSI83,
>>>>>>>>      	MODEL_SN65DSI84,
>>>>>>>> @@ -147,6 +157,8 @@ struct sn65dsi83 {
>>>>>>>>      	struct regulator		*vcc;
>>>>>>>>      	bool				lvds_dual_link;
>>>>>>>>      	bool				lvds_dual_link_even_odd_swap;
>>>>>>>> +	int				lvds_vod_swing_conf[2];
>>>>>>>> +	int				lvds_term_conf[2];
>>>>>>>>      };
>>>>>>>>      static const struct regmap_range sn65dsi83_readable_ranges[] = {
>>>>>>>> @@ -237,6 +249,36 @@ static const struct regmap_config sn65dsi83_regmap_config = {
>>>>>>>>      	.max_register = REG_IRQ_STAT,
>>>>>>>>      };
>>>>>>>> +static const int lvds_vod_swing_data_table[2][4][2] = {
>>>>>>>> +	{	/* 100 Ohm */
>>>>>>>> +		{ 180000, 313000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 215000, 372000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 250000, 430000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 290000, 488000 },
>>>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>>>> +	{	/* 200 Ohm */
>>>>>>>> +		{ 150000, 261000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 200000, 346000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 250000, 428000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 300000, 511000 },
>>>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static const int lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[2][4][2] = {
>>>>>>>> +	{	/* 100 Ohm */
>>>>>>>> +		{ 140000, 244000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 168000, 290000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 195000, 335000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 226000, 381000 },
>>>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>>>> +	{	/* 200 Ohm */
>>>>>>>> +		{ 117000, 204000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 156000, 270000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 195000, 334000 },
>>>>>>>> +		{ 234000, 399000 },
>>>>>>>> +	},
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>      static struct sn65dsi83 *bridge_to_sn65dsi83(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>>>>>>>>      {
>>>>>>>>      	return container_of(bridge, struct sn65dsi83, bridge);
>>>>>>>> @@ -435,12 +477,16 @@ static void sn65dsi83_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>>>>>>>      		val |= REG_LVDS_FMT_LVDS_LINK_CFG;
>>>>>>>>      	regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_LVDS_FMT, val);
>>>>>>>> -	regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_LVDS_VCOM, 0x05);
>>>>>>>> +	regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_LVDS_VCOM,
>>>>>>>> +			REG_LVDS_VCOM_CHA_LVDS_VOD_SWING(ctx->lvds_vod_swing_conf[CHANNEL_A]) |
>>>>>>>> +			REG_LVDS_VCOM_CHB_LVDS_VOD_SWING(ctx->lvds_vod_swing_conf[CHANNEL_B]));
>>>>>>>>      	regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_LVDS_LANE,
>>>>>>>>      		     (ctx->lvds_dual_link_even_odd_swap ?
>>>>>>>>      		      REG_LVDS_LANE_EVEN_ODD_SWAP : 0) |
>>>>>>>> -		     REG_LVDS_LANE_CHA_LVDS_TERM |
>>>>>>>> -		     REG_LVDS_LANE_CHB_LVDS_TERM);
>>>>>>>> +		     (ctx->lvds_term_conf[CHANNEL_A] ?
>>>>>>>> +			  REG_LVDS_LANE_CHA_LVDS_TERM : 0) |
>>>>>>>> +		     (ctx->lvds_term_conf[CHANNEL_B] ?
>>>>>>>> +			  REG_LVDS_LANE_CHB_LVDS_TERM : 0));
>>>>>>>>      	regmap_write(ctx->regmap, REG_LVDS_CM, 0x00);
>>>>>>>>      	le16val = cpu_to_le16(mode->hdisplay);
>>>>>>>> @@ -576,10 +622,100 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sn65dsi83_funcs = {
>>>>>>>>      	.atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = sn65dsi83_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
>>>>>>>>      };
>>>>>>>> +static int sn65dsi83_select_lvds_vod_swing(struct device *dev,
>>>>>>>> +	u32 lvds_vod_swing_data[2], u32 lvds_vod_swing_clk[2], u8 lvds_term)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> +	int i;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	for (i = 0; i <= 3; i++) {
>>>>>>>> +		if (lvds_vod_swing_data_table[lvds_term][i][0] >= lvds_vod_swing_data[0] &&
>>>>>>>> +		lvds_vod_swing_data_table[lvds_term][i][1] <= lvds_vod_swing_data[1] &&
>>>>>>>> +		lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[lvds_term][i][0] >= lvds_vod_swing_clk[0] &&
>>>>>>>> +		lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[lvds_term][i][1] <= lvds_vod_swing_clk[1])
>>>>>>>> +			return i;
>>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +	dev_err(dev, "failed to find appropriate LVDS_VOD_SWING configuration\n");
>>>>>>>> +	return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +static int sn65dsi83_parse_lvds_endpoint(struct sn65dsi83 *ctx, int channel)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> +	struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
>>>>>>>> +	struct device_node *endpoint;
>>>>>>>> +	int endpoint_reg;
>>>>>>>> +	/* Set so the property can be freely selected if not defined */
>>>>>>>> +	u32 lvds_vod_swing_data[2] = { 0, 1000000 };
>>>>>>>> +	u32 lvds_vod_swing_clk[2] = { 0, 1000000 };
>>>>>>>> +	u32 lvds_term;
>>>>>>>> +	u8 lvds_term_conf = 0x1;
>>>>>>>> +	int lvds_vod_swing_conf = 0x1;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Magic values
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you please elaborate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can use:
>>>>>> u8 lvds_term_conf = OHM_200;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about lvds_vod_swing_conf? Should I create additional define for it?
>>>>>> But this doesn't solve a hidden meaning? Maybe additional comment above?
>>>>>> Would like to avoid using voltages for it, since then we are reverse
>>>>>> engineering the table in datasheet to match the default reg value.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the following example solves both problems:
>>>>>
>>>>> lvds_term = 200;
>>>>> of_property_read_u32(..., &lvds_term);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (lvds_term == 100)
>>>>> 	ctx->lvds_term_conf[channel] = OHM_100;
>>>>> else if (lvds_term == 200)
>>>>> 	ctx->lvds_term_conf[channel] = OHM_200;
>>>>> else
>>>>> 	return -EINVAL;
>>>>>
>>>>> The same approach can be applied to lvds_vod_swing_conf, resulting in
>>>>> removal of magic values.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but I think it is not that easy when it comes to the
>>>> lvds_vod_swing_conf. We should assign default value if
>>>> "ti,lvds-vod-swing-data-microvolt" and "ti,lvds-vod-swing-clock-microvolt"
>>>> are not defined. Default value of the lvds_vod_swing_conf is 0x1, but this
>>>> doesn't have any straight forward meaning like OHM_200 for example.
>>>>
>>>> What we can do in that case is that we copy the values from defined
>>>> datasheet tables to the "lvds_vod_swing_data[2]" and "lvds_vod_swing_clk[2]"
>>>> arrays and then run the
>>>> sn65dsi83_select_lvds_vod_swing with it, which will return the default value
>>>> (0x1).
>>>>
>>>> /* If both properties are not defined assign default limits */
>>>> if (ret_data && ret_clock) {
>>>> 	memcpy(lvds_vod_swing_data,
>>>> 	     lvds_vod_swing_data_table[ctx->lvds_term_conf[channel]][1],
>>>> 	     sizeof(lvds_vod_swing_data));
>>>> 	memcpy(lvds_vod_swing_clk,
>>>> 	    lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[ctx->lvds_term_conf[channel]][1],
>>>> 	    sizeof(lvds_vod_swing_clk));
>>>> }
>>>> lvds_vod_swing_conf = sn65dsi83_select_lvds_vod_swing(dev,
>>>> 	lvds_vod_swing_data, lvds_vod_swing_clk,
>>>> 	ctx->lvds_term_conf[channel]);
>>>> if (lvds_vod_swing_conf < 0) {
>>>> 	ret = lvds_vod_swing_conf;
>>>> 	goto exit;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> ctx->lvds_vod_swing_conf[channel] = lvds_vod_swing_conf;
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if using this approach gets rid of the problem with magic
>>>> values.
>>>> Or maybe I'm not seeing the obvious solution so please bear with me.
>>>
>>> Yes, the defaults (0..1000000) should be fixed to result in the same
>>> value (0x01) as if the property wasn't specified at all
>>
>> The defaults (0..1000000) is selected because in case if only one property
>> is defined in dts (ti,lvds-vod-swing-data-microvolt or
>> ti,lvds-vod-swing-clock-microvolt) the other array values don't effect the
>> decision which "lvds_vod_swing_conf" is selected. That's why we initialized
>> the array to be out off bounds of the datasheet tables, all values in the
>> table match the not defined property, so lvds_vod_swing_conf is selected
>> purely on the basis of the defined property.
> 
> I see, thanks for the explanation.
> 
>>
>> Example:
>> DTS
>> ti,lvds-vod-swing-data-microvolt = <250000 428000>;
>> //ti,lvds-vod-swing-clock-microvolt NOT DEFINED;
>>
>> After parsing the devicetree we will get:
>> lvds_vod_swing_data = [ 250000, 428000 ]
>> lvds_vod_swing_clk = [ 0, 1000000 ]
>>
>> In sn65dsi83_select_lvds_vod_swing lvds_vod_swing_clk[] values don't effect
>> the decision making since
>>
>> lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[lvds_term][i][0] >= lvds_vod_swing_clk[0] &&
>> lvds_vod_swing_clock_table[lvds_term][i][1] <= lvds_vod_swing_clk[1]
>>
>> is always true.
>>
>>>
>>> I think the following should work:
>>>
>>> 	/* artifical values to select the defaults in both cases */
>>> 	u32 lvds_vod_swing_data[2] = { 190000, 330000 };
>>> 	u32 lvds_vod_swing_clk[2] = { 150000, 250000 };
>>
>> This sets the default to 0x0. It should be:
>> u32 lvds_vod_swing_data[2] = { 200000, 372000 };
>> u32 lvds_vod_swing_clk[2] = { 156000, 290000 };
>> This selects the default 0x1 in both cases, if termination is 100 or 200
>> Ohms.
>>
>> Nevertheless I think I got your point. But I would still like to give the
>> user the freedom to only specify one property if maybe connected panel only
>> has limits on data lanes/clock lane.
>> So maybe set the arrays lvds_vod_swing_data/clk to [0, 1000000] if
>> of_property_read_u32_array returns -EINVAL (property does not exist).
>> What do you say?
> 
> After your explanation, I think it might be better to explicitly set the
> value to 0x1, but not at the top of the function, but next to a check
> that both properties are (not) set.

Ok. Will apply this in the next version.
Thanks.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, they are artificial, as stated in the comment. Yes, I think it's
>>> better than special-casing in the property handling.
>>>
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list