[PATCH v4 7/7] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: allow DWC3 runtime suspend with UDC bound (E850+)
Peter Griffin
peter.griffin at linaro.org
Wed Dec 11 09:53:57 PST 2024
Hi André,
On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 22:03, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi André,
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:31, André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > To make USB runtime suspend work when a UDC has been bound, the phy
> > needs to inform the USBDRD controller (DWC3) that Vbus and bvalid are
> > gone, so that it can in turn raise the respective gadget interrupt with
> > event == DWC3_DEVICE_EVENT_DISCONNECT, which will cause the USB stack
> > to clean up, allowing DWC3 to enter runtime suspend.
> >
> > On e850 and gs101 this isn't working, as the respective signals are not
> > directly connected, and instead this driver uses override bits in the
> > PHY IP to set those signals. It currently forcefully sets them to 'on',
> > so the above mentioned interrupt will not be raised, preventing runtime
> > suspend.
> >
> > To detect that state, update this driver to act on the TCPC's
> > orientation signal - when orientation == NONE, Vbus is gone and we can
> > clear the respective bits. Similarly, for other orientation values we
> > re-enable them.
> >
> > This makes runtime suspend work on platforms with a TCPC (like Pixel6),
> > while keeping compatibility with platforms without (e850-96).
> >
> > With runtime suspend working, USB-C cable orientation detection now
> > also fully works on such platforms, and the link comes up as Superspeed
> > as expected irrespective of the cable orientation and whether UDC /
> > gadget are configured and active.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik at linaro.org>
>
> As mentioned on the last patch, in my testing cable orientation
> detection is working, but Pixel is detected as a superspeed device in
> one orientation, and high speed device in the other orientation. So
> you should either change the wording of the last paragraph in the
> commit message (assuming you get the same results as me) or make it
> detect as superspeed in both orientations.
You can disregard this point, I had a typo in my test setup :( I just
confirmed that it is detected as SuperSpeed in both orientations.
Thanks,
Peter
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list