[PATCH net v4 2/2] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Fix clearing of IEP_CMP_CFG registers during iep_init

[Dan Carpenter]

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 07:29:41PM +0530, Meghana Malladi wrote:
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icss_iep.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icss_iep.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icss_iep.c
> index 5d6d1cf78e93..a96861debbe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icss_iep.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icss_iep.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ static void icss_iep_enable_shadow_mode(struct icss_iep *iep)
>  	for (cmp = IEP_MIN_CMP; cmp < IEP_MAX_CMP; cmp++) {
>  		regmap_update_bits(iep->map, ICSS_IEP_CMP_STAT_REG,
>  				   IEP_CMP_STATUS(cmp), IEP_CMP_STATUS(cmp));
> +
> +		regmap_update_bits(iep->map, ICSS_IEP_CMP_CFG_REG,
> +				   IEP_CMP_CFG_CMP_EN(cmp), 0);
> +

Don't add this blank line.

You won't detect this by running checkpatch on the patch, but if you
apply the patch and re-run checkpatch on the file then it will complain
about this.

>  	}
>  
>  	/* enable reset counter on CMP0 event */
> @@ -780,6 +784,11 @@ int icss_iep_exit(struct icss_iep *iep)
>  	}
>  	icss_iep_disable(iep);
>  
> +	if (iep->pps_enabled)
> +		icss_iep_pps_enable(iep, false);
> +	else if (iep->perout_enabled)
> +		icss_iep_perout_enable(iep, NULL, false);


Do we need the else?  Could be written as:

	if (iep->pps_enabled)
		icss_iep_pps_enable(iep, false);
	if (iep->perout_enabled)
		icss_iep_perout_enable(iep, NULL, false);

regards,
dan carpenter