[PATCH v2 14/18] KVM: arm64: Introduce __pkvm_host_test_clear_young_guest()

[Quentin Perret]

On Tuesday 10 Dec 2024 at 15:11:53 (+0000), Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > index 8658b5932473..554ce31882e6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ int __pkvm_host_share_guest(u64 pfn, u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu, enum k
> >  int __pkvm_host_unshare_guest(u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vm *hyp_vm);
> >  int __pkvm_host_relax_guest_perms(u64 gfn, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  int __pkvm_host_wrprotect_guest(u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vm *hyp_vm);
> > +int __pkvm_host_test_clear_young_guest(u64 gfn, bool mkold, struct pkvm_hyp_vm *vm);
> 
> While I'm piling on the function names/parameters, some functions have
> _guest as a postfix at the end (e.g., this one), others have it in the
> middle (__pkvm_host_relax_guest_perms). I guess
> __pkvm_host_relax_guest_perms is the odd one out. Could you rename it?

Right, 'relax_guest_perms' felt more natural to me, but consistency
should take precedence, so I'll rename :-)