[PATCH v3 0/3] drm/rockchip: Add driver for the new DSI2 controller
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Mon Dec 9 17:45:11 PST 2024
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 03:22, Andy Yan <andyshrk at 163.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> 在 2024-12-10 09:01:38,"Dmitry Baryshkov" <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> 写道:
> >On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 08:50:51AM +0800, Andy Yan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> At 2024-12-10 07:12:26, "Heiko Stübner" <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> >> >Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2024, 17:11:03 CET schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 4:06 PM CET, Daniel Semkowicz wrote:
> >> >> > On 03.12.24 21:54, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> >> >> > > This series adds a bridge and glue driver for the DSI2 controller found
> >> >> > > in the rk3588 soc from Rockchip, that is based on a Synopsis IP block.
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I did more tests with different LVDS displays. I tested following
> >> >> > configurations with DSI/LVDS bridge:
> >> >> > - 1024x600 at 60.01
> >> >> > - 1024x768 at 60.02
> >> >> > - 1280x800 at 60.07
> >> >> > - 1366x768 at 60.06
> >> >> >
> >> >> > All of them worked without issues, except 1366x768.
> >> >> > With this resolution, video is blurry, and offset incorrectly
> >> >> > to the left. There are also repeating errors on the console:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > rockchip-drm display-subsystem: [drm] *ERROR* POST_BUF_EMPTY irq err at vp3
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In correct operation with other resolutions, there is no error.
> >> >> > I am not sure if this is a problem in your series or rather in VOP2
> >> >> > driver.
> >> >
> >> >This really sounds like something is wrong on the vop side.
> >> >The interrupt is part of the vop, the divisable by 4 things likely too.
> >>
> >> This is a hardware limitation on vop side:
> >> The horizontal resolution must be 4 pixel aligned.
> >
> >Then mode_valid() and atomic_check() must reject modes that don't fit.
>
> We round down to 4 pixel aligned in mode_fixup in our bsp kernel,
What is meant by the "bsp kernel" here? I don't see it being present
in the mainline kernel. So, if the mode is unsupported, it should be
rejected.
> because sometimes, some boards do indeed choose a screen that is not 4 pixel aligned
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >With best wishes
> >Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list