[PATCH -next v2 2/4] soc: ti: knav_dma: Use dev_err_probe() to simplfy code

[Nishanth Menon]

On 14:32-20240830, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify error handling
> during probe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Split into 2 patches.
> ---
>  drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c | 12 ++++--------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> index 15e41d3a5e22..eeec422a46f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_dma.c
> @@ -708,17 +708,13 @@ static int knav_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (!node) {
> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not find device info\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (!node)
> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL, "could not find device info\n");
>  
>  	kdev = devm_kzalloc(dev,
>  			sizeof(struct knav_dma_pool_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!kdev) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "could not allocate driver mem\n");
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	}
> +	if (!kdev)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "could not allocate driver mem\n");

These make no sense to me :( -> just using dev_err_probe when there is
no chance of -EPROBE_DEFER ?

>  
>  	kdev->dev = dev;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kdev->list);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D