[PATCH v10 3/4] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce Power Management Ops

[Nishanth Menon]

On 10:47-20240829, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for explaining. So should I add the header already with this
> series although it is unused right now, or should we add it together
> with the first actual user later on, so there is no unused header in the
> meantime?

Thinking deeper: we have two options:
a) dt bindings update with the property without knowing how the driver
  changes will be accepted or not.
b) drop the header changes for the macros.

I think (a) at this point is risky given the driver usage model is
un-clear - the APIs are abstract enough to be used in any way of choice,
but we do not want to be stuck with binding that then has to be
backward-forward compatible fixup..

So. (b) is better approach, IMHO..

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D