[PATCH v5 0/7] Event parsing fixes

Ian Rogers irogers at google.com
Wed Aug 28 10:14:01 PDT 2024


On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:02 AM Andi Kleen <ak at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 03:07:14PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > I rebased this one and made some other fixes so that I could test it,
> > so I thought I'd repost it here in case it's helpful. I also added a
> > new test.
> >
> > But for the testing it all looks ok.
> >
> > There is one small difference where it now hides _all_ <not supported>
> > events, when previously it would only hide some selected subset of
> > events like "stalled-cycles-frontend". I think this is now more
> > consistent across platforms because, for example, Apple M only has
> > cycles and instructions, and the rest of the default events would
> > always show as <not supported> there.
>
> I'm not a big fan of hiding all of <unsupported>, when they are explicitly
> specified on the command line they should be absolutely shown.
>
> I do have tools that specify events on the command line and expect
> the same order/events in the output. This might well cause breakage.

The patch series doesn't do this, it just doesn't display unsupported
events that came from the set of default events - default evsels have
a "skippable" flag set. In patch 3 James has added to
should_skip_zero_counter in stat-display.c:

+       /*
+        * Skip unsupported default events when not verbose. (default events
+        * are all marked 'skippable').
+        */
+       if (verbose == 0 && counter->skippable && !counter->supported)
+               return true;

Thanks,
Ian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list