[PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: microchip: Rename the usb node

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 14/08/2024 14:26, Andrei Simion wrote:
> Rename the usb node according to devicetree
> specification and update the label according
> with the node-specific standard as: ohci, ehci
> or gadget.

Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597

...


> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/aks-cdu.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/aks-cdu.dts
> index 742fcf525e1b..52e166c8a365 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/aks-cdu.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/aks-cdu.dts
> @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@ macb0: ethernet at fffc4000 {
>  				status = "okay";
>  			};
>  
> -			usb1: gadget at fffa4000 {
> +			gadget: usb at fffa4000 {
>  				atmel,vbus-gpio = <&pioC 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>  				status = "okay";
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> -		usb0: ohci at 500000 {
> +		ohci: usb at 500000 {

I don't think that these label renames are correct.

>  			num-ports = <2>;
>  			status = "okay";
>  		};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/animeo_ip.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/animeo_ip.dts
> index 29936bfbeeb7..911c8d9ee013 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/animeo_ip.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/animeo_ip.dts
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ ubi at 60000 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> -		usb0: ohci at 500000 {
> +		ohci: usb at 500000 {
>  			num-ports = <2>;
>  			atmel,vbus-gpio = <&pioB 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>  			status = "okay";
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91-ariag25.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91-ariag25.dts
> index 713d18f80356..fedcf30a924e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91-ariag25.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/at91-ariag25.dts
> @@ -173,11 +173,11 @@ &usart3 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> -&usb0 {
> +&ohci {
>  	status = "okay";
>  	num-ports = <3>;
>  };
>  
> -&usb1 {
> +&ehci {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };

And how now the sorting works? I don't get the point of it. What is
exactly wrong in the label that justifies the code reshuffling.

BTW, is this some sort of v2? If so, provide changelog and properly
version your patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof