[PATCH net-next v2] net: ti: icssg_prueth: Add SW TX / RX Coalescing based on hrtimers
MD Danish Anwar
danishanwar at ti.com
Mon Apr 29 22:10:29 PDT 2024
On 30/04/24 12:00 am, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 12:45:01PM +0530, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> Add SW IRQ coalescing based on hrtimers for RX and TX data path for ICSSG
>> driver, which can be enabled by ethtool commands:
>>
>> - RX coalescing
>> ethtool -C eth1 rx-usecs 50
>>
>> - TX coalescing can be enabled per TX queue
>>
>> - by default enables coalesing for TX0
>
> nit: coalescing
>
> Please consider running patches through ./checkpatch --codespell
>
>> ethtool -C eth1 tx-usecs 50
>> - configure TX0
>> ethtool -Q eth0 queue_mask 1 --coalesce tx-usecs 100
>> - configure TX1
>> ethtool -Q eth0 queue_mask 2 --coalesce tx-usecs 100
>> - configure TX0 and TX1
>> ethtool -Q eth0 queue_mask 3 --coalesce tx-usecs 100 --coalesce
>> tx-usecs 100
>>
>> Minimum value for both rx-usecs and tx-usecs is 20us.
>>
>> Compared to gro_flush_timeout and napi_defer_hard_irqs this patch allows
>> to enable IRQ coalescing for RX path separately.
>>
>> Benchmarking numbers:
>> ===============================================================
>> | Method | Tput_TX | CPU_TX | Tput_RX | CPU_RX |
>> | ==============================================================
>> | Default Driver 943 Mbps 31% 517 Mbps 38% |
>> | IRQ Coalescing (Patch) 943 Mbps 28% 518 Mbps 25% |
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar at ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v1 [1] to v2:
>> *) Added Benchmarking numbers in the commit message as suggested by
>> Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>. Full logs [2]
>> *) Addressed comments given by Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org> in v1.
>
> Sorry to be bothersome, but the W=1 problem isn't entirely fixed.
>
I'll check with W=1 and fix the warnings. I'll repost it soon.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424091823.1814136-1-danishanwar@ti.com/
>>
>> [2] https://gist.githubusercontent.com/danish-ti/47855631be9f3635cee994693662a988/raw/94b4eb86b42fe243ab03186a88a314e0cb272fd0/gistfile1.txt
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_common.c
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -190,19 +191,37 @@ int emac_tx_complete_packets(struct prueth_emac *emac, int chn,
>> return num_tx;
>> }
>>
>> +static enum hrtimer_restart emac_tx_timer_callback(struct hrtimer *timer)
>> +{
>> + struct prueth_tx_chn *tx_chns =
>> + container_of(timer, struct prueth_tx_chn, tx_hrtimer);
>> +
>> + enable_irq(tx_chns->irq);
>> + return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int emac_napi_tx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_tx, int budget)
>> {
>> struct prueth_tx_chn *tx_chn = prueth_napi_to_tx_chn(napi_tx);
>> struct prueth_emac *emac = tx_chn->emac;
>> + bool tdown = false;
>> int num_tx_packets;
>>
>> - num_tx_packets = emac_tx_complete_packets(emac, tx_chn->id, budget);
>> + num_tx_packets = emac_tx_complete_packets(emac, tx_chn->id, budget,
>> + &tdown);
>>
>> if (num_tx_packets >= budget)
>> return budget;
>>
>> - if (napi_complete_done(napi_tx, num_tx_packets))
>> - enable_irq(tx_chn->irq);
>> + if (napi_complete_done(napi_tx, num_tx_packets)) {
>> + if (unlikely(tx_chn->tx_pace_timeout_ns && !tdown)) {
>> + hrtimer_start(&tx_chn->tx_hrtimer,
>> + ns_to_ktime(tx_chn->tx_pace_timeout_ns),
>> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
>> + } else {
>> + enable_irq(tx_chn->irq);
>> + }
>
> This compiles with gcc-13 and clang-18 W=1
> (although the inner {} are unnecessary).
>
>> + }
>>
>> return num_tx_packets;
>> }
>
> ...
>
>> @@ -872,7 +894,13 @@ int emac_napi_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi_rx, int budget)
>> }
>>
>> if (num_rx < budget && napi_complete_done(napi_rx, num_rx))
>> - enable_irq(emac->rx_chns.irq[rx_flow]);
>> + if (unlikely(emac->rx_pace_timeout_ns)) {
>> + hrtimer_start(&emac->rx_hrtimer,
>> + ns_to_ktime(emac->rx_pace_timeout_ns),
>> + HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
>> + } else {
>> + enable_irq(emac->rx_chns.irq[rx_flow]);
>> + }
>
> But this does not; I think outer (but not inner) {} are needed.
>
> FIIIW, I believe this doesn't show-up in the netdev automated testing
> because this driver isn't built for x86 allmodconfig.
>
>>
>> return num_rx;
>> }
>
> ...
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Danish
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list