[PATCH v3 04/17] riscv: vector: Use vlenb from DT
Conor Dooley
conor at kernel.org
Fri Apr 26 08:17:52 PDT 2024
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 06:04:36PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> If vlenb is provided in the device tree, prefer that over reading the
> vlenb csr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie at rivosinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 347805446151..809f61ffb667 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo);
> /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */
> extern struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
>
> +extern u32 riscv_vlenb_dt[NR_CPUS];
> +
> void riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index c6e27b45e192..48874aac4871 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(riscv_isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) __read_mostly;
> /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */
> struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
>
> +u32 riscv_vlenb_dt[NR_CPUS];
> +
> /**
> * riscv_isa_extension_base() - Get base extension word
> *
> @@ -656,6 +658,28 @@ static int __init riscv_isa_fallback_setup(char *__unused)
> early_param("riscv_isa_fallback", riscv_isa_fallback_setup);
> #endif
>
> +static void riscv_set_vlenb_from_dt(void)
I'd expect to see a name here that had "of" in it, not "dt".
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct device_node *cpu_node;
> +
> + cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_node) {
> + pr_warn("Unable to find cpu node\n");
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(cpu_node, "riscv,vlenb", &riscv_vlenb_dt[cpu])) {
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> + }
> +}
> +
> void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> {
> char print_str[NUM_ALPHA_EXTS + 1];
> @@ -675,6 +699,8 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> } else {
> int ret = riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(isa2hwcap);
>
> + riscv_set_vlenb_from_dt();
Hmm, I think we can go a step further here. We know all of the CPUs
widths by the time we get to the first call to riscv_v_setup_vsize(), can
we examine the whole list and decide not to enable vector if they do
not match, rather than continuing and failing to online CPUs that having
the mismatched size?
I guess that can go into the `if (elf_hwcap & COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_V)`
condition we already have, and would require clearing the bit from the
mask we have at the moment.
Cheers,
Conor.
> +
> if (ret && riscv_isa_fallback) {
> pr_info("Falling back to deprecated \"riscv,isa\"\n");
> riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(isa2hwcap);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> index 6727d1d3b8f2..fb7f3ca80d9e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> @@ -32,11 +32,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_v_vsize);
> int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void)
> {
> unsigned long this_vsize;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> - /* There are 32 vector registers with vlenb length. */
> - riscv_v_enable();
> - this_vsize = csr_read(CSR_VLENB) * 32;
> - riscv_v_disable();
> + if (riscv_vlenb_dt[cpu]) {
> + this_vsize = riscv_vlenb_dt[cpu];
> + } else {
> + /* There are 32 vector registers with vlenb length. */
> + riscv_v_enable();
> + this_vsize = csr_read(CSR_VLENB) * 32;
> + riscv_v_disable();
> + }
>
> if (!riscv_v_vsize) {
> riscv_v_vsize = this_vsize;
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20240426/e36f9ed4/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list