[PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: blaize: Add Blaize BLZP1600 SoC

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Thu Apr 25 02:16:42 PDT 2024


On 25/04/2024 11:15, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the Blaize BLZP1600 CB2
> development board (carrier board), which uses the
> BLZP1600 SoM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Cowgill <james.cowgill at blaize.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn at blaize.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Jones <neil.jones at blaize.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos at blaize.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml       | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8034aeb7a2b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/blaize.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Blaize Platforms
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - James Cowgill <james.cowgill at blaize.com>
> +  - Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn at blaize.com>
> +  - Neil Jones <neil.jones at blaize.com>
> +  - Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos at blaize.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  Blaize Platforms using SoCs designed by Blaize Inc.
> +
> +  The products currently based on the BLZP1600 SoC:
> +
> +  - BLZP1600-SoM: SoM module
> +  - BLZP1600-CB2: Development board CB2 based on BLZP1600-SoM
> +
> +  The compatible property should follow the format:
> +
> +  compatible = "blaize,blzp1600-cb2", "blaize,blzp1600";

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list