[PATCH v2 6/6] usb: dwc3: exynos: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()

[Thinh Nguyen]

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Thinh,
> 
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 07:24, Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen at synopsys.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2024, Anand Moon wrote:
> > > Use the new PM macros for the suspend and resume functions to be
> > > automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are disabled,
> > > without having to use #ifdef guards. If CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unused,
> > > they will simply be discarded by the compiler.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon at gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: add __maybe_unused to suspend/resume functions in case CONFIG_PM is
> > >    disabled.
> >
> > The compiler discards the code, yet we still need __maybe_unused?
> >
> Earlier version had not added this since but I removed the
> guard.CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
> added __maybe_unused just to safeguard the function.
> 
> I have tried to build with config by disabling CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> but could get the warning compilation by adding flag W=1
> -Werror=unused-function.
> 

<snip>

> 
> But since these CONFIG_PM and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP cannot be disabled,
> I am not getting any warning related to these functions.
> 
> Do you want me to remove __maybe_unused ?
> 

The warning was there as expected. You should to use it along with
DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(). Let me know if you still see the same
warning.

BR,
Thinh