[PATCH net-next v4 2/9] net: create a dummy net_device allocator
Ido Schimmel
idosch at idosch.org
Wed Apr 10 04:10:04 PDT 2024
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 05:57:16AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> It is impossible to use init_dummy_netdev together with alloc_netdev()
> as the 'setup' argument.
>
> This is because alloc_netdev() initializes some fields in the net_device
> structure, and later init_dummy_netdev() memzero them all. This causes
> some problems as reported here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322082336.49f110cc@kernel.org/
>
> Split the init_dummy_netdev() function in two. Create a new function called
> init_dummy_netdev_core() that does not memzero the net_device structure.
> Then have init_dummy_netdev() memzero-ing and calling
> init_dummy_netdev_core(), keeping the old behaviour.
>
> init_dummy_netdev_core() is the new function that could be called as an
> argument for alloc_netdev().
>
> Also, create a helper to allocate and initialize dummy net devices,
> leveraging init_dummy_netdev_core() as the setup argument. This function
> basically simplify the allocation of dummy devices, by allocating and
> initializing it. Freeing the device continue to be done through
> free_netdev()
>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao at debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch at nvidia.com>
We were about to submit another user of init_dummy_netdev() when I
noticed this patch. Converted the code to use alloc_netdev_dummy() [1]
and it seems to be working fine. Will submit after your patch is
accepted.
See a few minor comments below.
[...]
> +/**
> + * init_dummy_netdev - init a dummy network device for NAPI
> + * @dev: device to init
> + *
> + * This takes a network device structure and initialize the minimum
s/initialize/initializes/
> + * amount of fields so it can be used to schedule NAPI polls without
> + * registering a full blown interface. This is to be used by drivers
> + * that need to tie several hardware interfaces to a single NAPI
> + * poll scheduler due to HW limitations.
> + */
> +void init_dummy_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + /* Clear everything. Note we don't initialize spinlocks
> + * are they aren't supposed to be taken by any of the
I assume you meant s/are/as/ ?
> + * NAPI code and this dummy netdev is supposed to be
> + * only ever used for NAPI polls
> + */
> + memset(dev, 0, sizeof(struct net_device));
> + init_dummy_netdev_core(dev);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(init_dummy_netdev);
[1]
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
index db2950baf6b4..bf66d996e32e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/pci.c
@@ -132,20 +132,40 @@ struct mlxsw_pci {
u8 num_cqs; /* Number of CQs */
u8 num_sdqs; /* Number of SDQs */
bool skip_reset;
- struct net_device napi_dev_tx;
- struct net_device napi_dev_rx;
+ struct net_device *napi_dev_tx;
+ struct net_device *napi_dev_rx;
};
-static void mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci)
+static int mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_init(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci)
{
- init_dummy_netdev(&mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx);
- strscpy(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx.name, "mlxsw_tx",
- sizeof(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx.name));
+ int err;
+
+ mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx = alloc_netdev_dummy(0);
+ if (!mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ strscpy(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx->name, "mlxsw_tx",
+ sizeof(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx->name));
+
+ mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx = alloc_netdev_dummy(0);
+ if (!mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_alloc_rx;
+ }
+ strscpy(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx->name, "mlxsw_rx",
+ sizeof(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx->name));
+ dev_set_threaded(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx, true);
+
+ return 0;
- init_dummy_netdev(&mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx);
- strscpy(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx.name, "mlxsw_rx",
- sizeof(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx.name));
- dev_set_threaded(&mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx, true);
+err_alloc_rx:
+ free_netdev(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_fini(struct mlxsw_pci *mlxsw_pci)
+{
+ free_netdev(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx);
+ free_netdev(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx);
}
static char *__mlxsw_pci_queue_elem_get(struct mlxsw_pci_queue *q,
@@ -804,11 +824,11 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_cq_napi_setup(struct mlxsw_pci_queue *q,
switch (cq_type) {
case MLXSW_PCI_CQ_SDQ:
- netif_napi_add(&mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx, &q->u.cq.napi,
+ netif_napi_add(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_tx, &q->u.cq.napi,
mlxsw_pci_napi_poll_cq_tx);
break;
case MLXSW_PCI_CQ_RDQ:
- netif_napi_add(&mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx, &q->u.cq.napi,
+ netif_napi_add(mlxsw_pci->napi_dev_rx, &q->u.cq.napi,
mlxsw_pci_napi_poll_cq_rx);
break;
}
@@ -1793,7 +1813,10 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_init(void *bus_priv, struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core,
if (err)
goto err_requery_resources;
- mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_init(mlxsw_pci);
+ err = mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_init(mlxsw_pci);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_napi_devs_init;
+
err = mlxsw_pci_aqs_init(mlxsw_pci, mbox);
if (err)
goto err_aqs_init;
@@ -1811,6 +1834,8 @@ static int mlxsw_pci_init(void *bus_priv, struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core,
err_request_eq_irq:
mlxsw_pci_aqs_fini(mlxsw_pci);
err_aqs_init:
+ mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_fini(mlxsw_pci);
+err_napi_devs_init:
err_requery_resources:
err_config_profile:
err_cqe_v_check:
@@ -1838,6 +1863,7 @@ static void mlxsw_pci_fini(void *bus_priv)
free_irq(pci_irq_vector(mlxsw_pci->pdev, 0), mlxsw_pci);
mlxsw_pci_aqs_fini(mlxsw_pci);
+ mlxsw_pci_napi_devs_fini(mlxsw_pci);
mlxsw_pci_fw_area_fini(mlxsw_pci);
mlxsw_pci_free_irq_vectors(mlxsw_pci);
}
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list