[PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: mm: Don't remap pgtables per-cont(pte|pmd) block
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed Apr 10 02:46:24 PDT 2024
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:33:05PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> A large part of the kernel boot time is creating the kernel linear map
> page tables. When rodata=full, all memory is mapped by pte. And when
> there is lots of physical ram, there are lots of pte tables to populate.
> The primary cost associated with this is mapping and unmapping the pte
> table memory in the fixmap; at unmap time, the TLB entry must be
> invalidated and this is expensive.
>
> Previously, each pmd and pte table was fixmapped/fixunmapped for each
> cont(pte|pmd) block of mappings (16 entries with 4K granule). This means
> we ended up issuing 32 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table during the population
> phase.
>
> Let's fix that, and fixmap/fixunmap each page once per population, for a
> saving of 31 TLBIs per (pmd|pte) table. This gives a significant boot
> speedup.
>
> Execution time of map_mem(), which creates the kernel linear map page
> tables, was measured on different machines with different RAM configs:
>
> | Apple M2 VM | Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra| Ampere Altra
> | VM, 16G | VM, 64G | VM, 256G | Metal, 512G
> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
> | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%)
> ---------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------
> before | 153 (0%) | 2227 (0%) | 8798 (0%) | 17442 (0%)
> after | 77 (-49%) | 431 (-81%) | 1727 (-80%) | 3796 (-78%)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
> Tested-by: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama at fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Eric Chanudet <echanude at redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 495b732d5af3..fd91b5bdb514 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -172,12 +172,9 @@ bool pgattr_change_is_safe(u64 old, u64 new)
> return ((old ^ new) & ~mask) == 0;
> }
>
> -static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> - phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
> +static pte_t *init_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> + phys_addr_t phys, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - pte_t *ptep;
> -
> - ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
> do {
> pte_t old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>
> @@ -193,7 +190,7 @@ static void init_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> phys += PAGE_SIZE;
> } while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>
> - pte_clear_fixmap();
> + return ptep;
> }
>
> static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -204,6 +201,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> {
> unsigned long next;
> pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
> + pte_t *ptep;
>
> BUG_ON(pmd_sect(pmd));
> if (pmd_none(pmd)) {
> @@ -219,6 +217,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> }
> BUG_ON(pmd_bad(pmd));
>
> + ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
> do {
> pgprot_t __prot = prot;
>
> @@ -229,20 +228,20 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pte(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
> (flags & NO_CONT_MAPPINGS) == 0)
> __prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) | PTE_CONT);
>
> - init_pte(pmdp, addr, next, phys, __prot);
> + ptep = init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot);
>
> phys += next - addr;
> } while (addr = next, addr != end);
I reckon it might be better to leave init_pte() returning void, and move the
ptep along here, e.g.
ptep = pte_set_fixmap_offset(pmdp, addr);
do {
...
init_pte(ptep, addr, next, phys, __prot);
ptep += pte_index(next) - pte_index(addr);
phys += next - addr;
} while (addr = next, addr != end);
... as that keeps the relationship between 'ptep' and 'phys' clear since
they're manipulated in the same way, adjacent to one another.
Regardless this looks good, so with that change or as-is:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
... though I would prefer with that change. ;)
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list