[PATCH v10 2/4] dt-bindings: stm32: update DT bingding for stm32mp25
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Wed Apr 10 00:06:31 PDT 2024
On 09/04/2024 19:12, gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
>
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT bindings". (plus a
typo...) The "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are
bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
Subject: Everything is an update. Be specific.
> RCC driver uses '.index' to define all parent clocks instead '.names'
> because the use of a name to define a parent clock is prohibited.
> This is ABI change, but the RCC driver has not yet merged, unlike all
> others drivers besides Linux.
>
> Fixes: b5be49db3d47 ("dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform")
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez at foss.st.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v10:
> - cosmetic change (add change blank line)
> - rename USB2 into USBH to be compliant with last Reference Manuel
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Update DT binding documentation according S.Boyd remarks on RCC driver:
> Don't use '.name' to define a parent but use '.index'
> Then:
> - remove 'clock-names' property
> - Add description of all parent clocks used in RCC driver
>
> v9 was Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
Please avoid putting full acks somewhere in the changelog. You confuse
people's filters and maybe tooling as well. "v9 was Acked-by Conor
Dooley", so a proper sentence, not "fake" ack, would work for everyone.
With fixes in the subject:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list