[PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: armltd: Move Arm board syscon's to separate schema

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Mon Sep 18 10:27:20 PDT 2023


On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:36:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:15:05 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > The Arm Ltd board bindings are a bit unusual in that they define child
> > > nodes for various syscon's. The schemas are also incomplete as they lack
> > > constraints on having additional properties and some properties are
> > > missing. As the bindings for the different platforms only vary by
> > > compatibles, combine them into a single schema doc.
> > > 
> > > Add the "arm,im-pd1-syscon" compatible which was not documented. Add
> > > "ranges", "#address-cells", and "#size-cells properties which were
> > > missing.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/arm/arm,integrator.yaml          | 39 -----------
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,realview.yaml | 37 ----------
> > >  .../bindings/arm/arm,versatile.yaml           | 40 +++--------
> > >  .../mfd/arm,dev-platforms-syscon.yaml         | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/arm,dev-platforms-syscon.yaml
> > > 
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> Errr ... I'm a little torn.
> 
> Do I trust the maintainer or his bot? :)

New version fixing the example coming...

Rob



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list