[PATCH v2 4/8] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible for SM4450 SoC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 15/09/2023 09:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 9/15/2023 3:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 15/09/2023 04:15, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>> Add the SoC specific compatible for SM4450 implementing arm,mmu-500.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan at quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>>> index cf29ab10501c..b57751c8ad90 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
>>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
>>>                 - qcom,sdx55-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sdx65-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sdx75-smmu-500
>>> +              - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sm6115-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sm6125-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sm6350-smmu-500
>>> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ properties:
>>>                 - qcom,sc8180x-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sc8280xp-smmu-500
>>>                 - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
>>> +              - qcom,sm4450-smmu-500
>>
>> Isn't there comment just few lines above your edit? Comment saying DON'T?
> yes, I saw this "DON'T" comment, but if I remove "qcom,sm4450-smmu-500" 
> from sm4450.dtsi and this arm,smmu.yaml, will get DT check warning about 

Why would you remove it?

> this, this warning cannot be find after add "qcom,sm4450-smmu-500" from 
> sm4450.dtsi and this arm,smmu.yaml, so update this patch again.

What does the comment say? Why are you adding it to the enum which asks
- do not add to this enum, but add to other above and below?


Best regards,
Krzysztof