[PATCH v3 1/3] perf pmu: Move pmu__find_core_pmu() to pmus.c

James Clark james.clark at arm.com
Wed Sep 13 08:33:48 PDT 2023


pmu__find_core_pmu() more logically belongs in pmus.c because it
iterates over all PMUs, so move it to pmus.c

At the same time rename it to perf_pmus__find_core_pmu() to match the
naming convention in this file.

list_prepare_entry() can't be used in perf_pmus__scan_core() anymore now
that it's called from the same compilation unit. This is with -O2
(specifically -O1 -ftree-vrp -finline-functions
-finline-small-functions) which allow the bounds of the array
access to be determined at compile time. list_prepare_entry() subtracts
the offset of the 'list' member in struct perf_pmu from &core_pmus,
which isn't a struct perf_pmu. The compiler sees that pmu results in
&core_pmus - 8 and refuses to compile. At runtime this works because
list_for_each_entry_continue() always adds the offset back again before
dereferencing ->next, but it's technically undefined behavior. With
-fsanitize=undefined an additional warning is generated.

Using list_first_entry_or_null() to get the first entry here avoids
doing &core_pmus - 8 but has the same result and fixes both the compile
warning and the undefined behavior warning. There are other uses of
list_prepare_entry() in pmus.c, but the compiler doesn't seem to be
able to see that they can also be called with &core_pmus, so I won't
change any at this time.

Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c |  6 +++---
 tools/perf/tests/expr.c          |  2 +-
 tools/perf/util/expr.c           |  2 +-
 tools/perf/util/pmu.c            | 17 -----------------
 tools/perf/util/pmu.h            |  2 +-
 tools/perf/util/pmus.c           | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 6 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
index 615084eb88d8..3d9330feebd2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
 {
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 
 	if (pmu)
 		return perf_pmu__find_metrics_table(pmu);
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ const struct pmu_metrics_table *pmu_metrics_table__find(void)
 
 const struct pmu_events_table *pmu_events_table__find(void)
 {
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 
 	if (pmu)
 		return perf_pmu__find_events_table(pmu);
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void)
 {
 	char path[PATH_MAX];
 	unsigned long long slots = 0;
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 
 	if (pmu) {
 		perf_pmu__pathname_scnprintf(path, sizeof(path),
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
index 78544092ef0c..e3aa9d4fcf3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
 	struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
 	bool is_intel = false;
 	char strcmp_cpuid_buf[256];
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 	char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
 	char *escaped_cpuid1, *escaped_cpuid2;
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/expr.c b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
index 4488f306de78..7be23b3ac082 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/expr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/expr.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ double expr__strcmp_cpuid_str(const struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx __maybe_unused,
 		       bool compute_ids __maybe_unused, const char *test_id)
 {
 	double ret;
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = pmu__find_core_pmu();
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
 	char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
 
 	if (!cpuid)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index e2159854ab26..f50a5636633f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -2050,20 +2050,3 @@ void perf_pmu__delete(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
 	zfree(&pmu->id);
 	free(pmu);
 }
-
-struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void)
-{
-	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
-
-	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu))) {
-		/*
-		 * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
-		 * not support some events or have different event IDs.
-		 */
-		if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
-			return NULL;
-
-		return pmu;
-	}
-	return NULL;
-}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
index bd5d804a6736..d7b46085642d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
@@ -264,6 +264,6 @@ int perf_pmu__pathname_fd(int dirfd, const char *pmu_name, const char *filename,
 struct perf_pmu *perf_pmu__lookup(struct list_head *pmus, int dirfd, const char *lookup_name);
 struct perf_pmu *perf_pmu__create_placeholder_core_pmu(struct list_head *core_pmus);
 void perf_pmu__delete(struct perf_pmu *pmu);
-struct perf_pmu *pmu__find_core_pmu(void);
+struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__find_core_pmu(void);
 
 #endif /* __PMU_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
index 6631367c756f..cec869cbe163 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmus.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <pthread.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+#include "cpumap.h"
 #include "debug.h"
 #include "evsel.h"
 #include "pmus.h"
@@ -268,7 +269,7 @@ struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__scan_core(struct perf_pmu *pmu)
 {
 	if (!pmu) {
 		pmu_read_sysfs(/*core_only=*/true);
-		pmu = list_prepare_entry(pmu, &core_pmus, list);
+		return list_first_entry_or_null(&core_pmus, typeof(*pmu), list);
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry_continue(pmu, &core_pmus, list)
 		return pmu;
@@ -592,3 +593,20 @@ struct perf_pmu *evsel__find_pmu(const struct evsel *evsel)
 	}
 	return pmu;
 }
+
+struct perf_pmu *perf_pmus__find_core_pmu(void)
+{
+	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
+
+	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu))) {
+		/*
+		 * The cpumap should cover all CPUs. Otherwise, some CPUs may
+		 * not support some events or have different event IDs.
+		 */
+		if (RC_CHK_ACCESS(pmu->cpus)->nr != cpu__max_cpu().cpu)
+			return NULL;
+
+		return pmu;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
-- 
2.34.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list