[PATCH] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add description for mt8365-evk board

[Macpaul Lin]

On 9/11/23 15:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 	
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you 
> have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> On 11/09/2023 08:34, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>> On 9/11/23 14:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you 
>>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>>
>>> On 10/09/2023 14:07, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/10/23 17:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> +      - description: MediaTek Genio 350 Boards (Genio 350 EVK)
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a bit confusing. So all of the boards here will be Genio 350 EVK?
>>>>> I don't get what is the point of this description.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> +        items:
>>>>>>            - enum:
>>>>>>                - mediatek,mt8365-evk
>>>>>>            - const: mediatek,mt8365
>>>>
>>>> Thes boards with compatible 'mediatek,mt8365-evk' is indeed used by
>>>
>>> Boards?
>> 
>> I'm not sure if there will be more hardware version released to market.
>> Current the p1v3 is the final version of mt8365-evk.
> 
> Then your code (enum) does not match description. The code is saying:
> this is for multiple boards based on mt8365.
> 
> Your description is saying: this is only for 350 boards.
> 
> Now your email is saying: there is only one 350 board.
> 
> Three different versions. Sorry, I am confused.
> 

Okay, this description has been modified to support single board.
Since there is only one type of the hardware is available on the market.

>> 
>>>> Genio 350-EVK, which Baylibre helped to do upstream tasks. The only 
>>>> production version of hardware will be available on the market. The 
>>>> derived version of customer's hardware is not available yet.
>>>>
>>>> The separate patch for renaming mt8365-evk.dts file should be send next 
>>>> week for aligning the naming rules.
>>>
>>> So the description is not correct.
>>>
>>> Anyway, this patch does not make much sense to me considering nothing
>>> like this was merged. You just sent v5 doing the same!
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry I'm confused now.
>> These are independent patches.
>> This patch is for SOC mt83'6'5 and board mt8365-evk, which is not relate 
>> SOC mt83'9'5 and board mt8395-evk.
> 
> OK, I see my confusion. mt8365 and mt8395.
> 
> Still the description is not matching the code, at least to my limited
> understanding of the description.
> 

patch v2 of this change has been send and rebase with that v5 change.
This will generate a different base line for the v2 patch for avoiding 
confusion. :)


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thanks
Macpaul Lin