[PATCH v8 07/13] coresight-tpdm: Add nodes to set trigger timestamp and type
Suzuki K Poulose
suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Fri Sep 8 01:27:33 PDT 2023
On 01/09/2023 15:41, Tao Zhang wrote:
>
> On 9/1/2023 6:43 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 22/08/2023 06:26, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>> The nodes are needed to set or show the trigger timestamp and
>>> trigger type. This change is to add these nodes to achieve these
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha at quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm | 22 +++++
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 95
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>> b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>> index 2936226..9e26e30 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tpdm
>>> @@ -21,3 +21,25 @@ Description:
>>> Accepts only one value - 1.
>>> 1 : Reset the dataset of the tpdm
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<tpdm-name>/dsb_trig_type
>>> +Date: March 2023
>>> +KernelVersion 6.5
>>
>> 6.7
>>
>>> +Contact: Jinlong Mao (QUIC) <quic_jinlmao at quicinc.com>, Tao Zhang
>>> (QUIC) <quic_taozha at quicinc.com>
>>> +Description:
>>> + (RW) Set/Get the trigger type of the DSB for tpdm.
>>> +
>>> + Accepts only one of the 2 values - 0 or 1.
>>> + 0 : Set the DSB trigger type to false
>>> + 1 : Set the DSB trigger type to true
>>> +
>>> +What: /sys/bus/coresight/devices/<tpdm-name>/dsb_trig_ts
>>> +Date: March 2023
>>> +KernelVersion 6.5
>>
>> Same here
>>
>>> +Contact: Jinlong Mao (QUIC) <quic_jinlmao at quicinc.com>, Tao Zhang
>>> (QUIC) <quic_taozha at quicinc.com>
>>> +Description:
>>> + (RW) Set/Get the trigger timestamp of the DSB for tpdm.
>>> +
>>> + Accepts only one of the 2 values - 0 or 1.
>>> + 0 : Set the DSB trigger type to false
>>> + 1 : Set the DSB trigger type to true
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>> index d6e7c8c..8e11c9b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,18 @@ static bool tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(struct
>>> tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> return (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB);
>>> }
>>> +static umode_t tpdm_dsb_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>>> + struct attribute *attr, int n)
>>
>> minor nit: please align.
>>
>> static umode_t tpdm_dsb_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>> struct attribute *attr, int n)
>>
>> I don't know if you have a different setting for tabs in your editor.
>> Please refer to the coding style document.
>
> Tab size is set to 4 in my editor.
Please read :
Documentation/process/coding-style.rst, section 1.
Suzuki
>
> There are 5 tabs and 3 spaces at the beginning of this line.
>
> I don't know if this is the same as what you see in this patch.
>
> I see from the editor that the code meets the requirements of the coding
> style document.
>
> If the gap in alignment is not resolved, such alignment problems may
> still occur.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tao
>
>>
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
>>> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>> +
>>> + if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
>>> + return attr->mode;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void tpdm_reset_datasets(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>>> {
>>> if (tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata)) {
>>> @@ -232,8 +244,91 @@ static struct attribute_group tpdm_attr_grp = {
>>> .attrs = tpdm_attrs,
>>> };
>>> +static ssize_t dsb_trig_type_show(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>>
>> same here.
>>
>>> +{
>>> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>> +
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",
>>> + (unsigned int)drvdata->dsb->trig_type);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Trigger type (boolean):
>>> + * false - Disable trigger type.
>>> + * true - Enable trigger type.
>>> + */
>>> +static ssize_t dsb_trig_type_store(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + const char *buf,
>>> + size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>> + unsigned long val;
>>> +
>>> + if ((kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val)) || (val & ~1UL))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>> + if (val)
>>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_type = true;
>>> + else
>>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_type = false;
>>> + spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>> + return size;
>>> +}
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_trig_type);
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t dsb_trig_ts_show(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + char *buf)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>> +
>>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n",
>>> + (unsigned int)drvdata->dsb->trig_ts);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Trigger timestamp (boolean):
>>> + * false - Disable trigger timestamp.
>>> + * true - Enable trigger timestamp.
>>> + */
>>> +static ssize_t dsb_trig_ts_store(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>>> + const char *buf,
>>> + size_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
>>> + unsigned long val;
>>> +
>>> + if ((kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val)) || (val & ~1UL))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>> + if (val)
>>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_ts = true;
>>> + else
>>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_ts = false;
>>> + spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>>> + return size;
>>> +}
>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(dsb_trig_ts);
>>> +
>>> +static struct attribute *tpdm_dsb_attrs[] = {
>>> + &dev_attr_dsb_trig_ts.attr,
>>> + &dev_attr_dsb_trig_type.attr,
>>> + NULL,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct attribute_group tpdm_dsb_attr_grp = {
>>> + .attrs = tpdm_dsb_attrs,
>>> + .is_visible = tpdm_dsb_is_visible,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static const struct attribute_group *tpdm_attr_grps[] = {
>>> &tpdm_attr_grp,
>>> + &tpdm_dsb_attr_grp,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>
>> Rest looks fine to me
>>
>> Suzuki
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list