[PATCH v4 3/3] remoteproc: zynqmp: get TCM from device-tree
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
philmd at linaro.org
Mon Sep 4 00:50:37 PDT 2023
Hi,
On 29/8/23 20:19, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> Use new dt bindings to get TCM address and size
> information. Also make sure that driver stays
> compatible with previous device-tree bindings.
> So, if TCM information isn't available in device-tree
> for zynqmp platform, hard-coded address of TCM will
> be used.
>
> New platforms that are compatible with this
> driver must add TCM support in device-tree as per new
> bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 279 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 221 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> /**
> @@ -75,11 +79,17 @@ struct mbox_info {
> * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are
> * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel
Just curious, for how long this fall back code has to be maintained?
(When/how will we know we can remove it?)
> */
> -static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
> - {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> - {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
> - {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
> - {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = {
> + {0xffe00000, 0x0, 0x10000, PD_R5_0_ATCM, 0, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
> + {0xffe20000, 0x20000, 0x10000, PD_R5_0_BTCM, 0, "btcm0"},
> + {0xffe90000, 0x0, 0x10000, PD_R5_1_ATCM, 0, "atcm1"},
> + {0xffeb0000, 0x20000, 0x10000, PD_R5_1_BTCM, 0, "btcm1"},
> +};
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list