[PATCH v2 1/2] clk: mediatek: clk-mux: Support custom parent indices for muxes
Chen-Yu Tsai
wenst at chromium.org
Sun Oct 22 23:58:43 PDT 2023
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 2:57 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:36 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for customized parent indices for MediaTek muxes: this is
> > necessary for the case in which we want to exclude some clocks from
> > a mux's parent clocks list, where the exclusions are not from the
> > very bottom of the list but either in the middle or the beginning.
> >
> > Example:
> > - MUX1 (all parents)
> > - parent1; idx=0
> > - parent2; idx=1
> > - parent3; idx=2
> >
> > - MUX1 (wanted parents)
> > - parent1; idx=0
> > - parent3; idx=2
> >
> > To achieve that add a `parent_index` array pointer to struct mtk_mux,
> > then in .set_parent(), .get_parent() callbacks check if this array
> > was populated and eventually get the index from that.
> >
> > Also, to avoid updating all clock drivers for all SoCs, rename the
> > "main" macro to __GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS (so, `__` was added) and
> > add the new member to it; furthermore, GATE_CLK_SET_UPD_FLAGS has
> > been reintroduced as being fully compatible with the older version.
> >
> > The new parent_index can be specified with the new `_INDEXED`
> > variants of the MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_xxxx macros.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat at baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c | 14 +++++++++++
> > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> > index c93bc7f926e5..60990296450b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.c
> > @@ -89,6 +89,17 @@ static u8 mtk_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->data->mux_ofs, &val);
> > val = (val >> mux->data->mux_shift) & mask;
> >
> > + if (mux->data->parent_index) {
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < mux->data->num_parents; i++)
> > + if (mux->data->parent_index[i] == val)
> > + return i;
> > +
> > + /* Not found: return an impossible index to generate error */
> > + return mux->data->num_parents + 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > return val;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -104,6 +115,9 @@ static int mtk_clk_mux_set_parent_setclr_lock(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> > else
> > __acquire(mux->lock);
> >
> > + if (mux->data->parent_index)
> > + index = mux->data->parent_index[index];
> > +
> > regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->data->mux_ofs, &orig);
> > val = (orig & ~(mask << mux->data->mux_shift))
> > | (index << mux->data->mux_shift);
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> > index 7ecb963b0ec6..943ad1d7ce4b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mux.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ struct mtk_mux {
> > int id;
> > const char *name;
> > const char * const *parent_names;
> > + const u8 *parent_index;
> > unsigned int flags;
> >
> > u32 mux_ofs;
> > @@ -37,9 +38,10 @@ struct mtk_mux {
> > signed char num_parents;
> > };
> >
> > -#define GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> > - _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > - _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) { \
> > +#define __GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _paridx, \
> > + _num_parents, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, \
> > + _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, \
> > + _upd, _flags, _ops) { \
>
> Nit: I would take this opportunity to fix up the alignment of the lines
> here, as well as for the new macros. Also you needn't wrap the lines at
> 80 characters. Instead I would wrap where it makes more sense, like group
> arguments for the same type (parents / mux / gate / update ...) on the
> same line if possible.
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
And of course I meant to send this from my chromium.org address...
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
> > .id = _id, \
> > .name = _name, \
> > .mux_ofs = _mux_ofs, \
> > @@ -51,11 +53,28 @@ struct mtk_mux {
> > .gate_shift = _gate, \
> > .upd_shift = _upd, \
> > .parent_names = _parents, \
> > - .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), \
> > + .parent_index = _paridx, \
> > + .num_parents = _num_parents, \
> > .flags = _flags, \
> > .ops = &_ops, \
> > }
> >
> > +#define GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) \
> > + __GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, \
> > + NULL, ARRAY_SIZE(_parents), _mux_ofs, \
> > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) \
> > +
> > +#define GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS_INDEXED(_id, _name, _parents, _paridx, \
> > + _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, \
> > + _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) \
> > + __GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parents, \
> > + _paridx, ARRAY_SIZE(_paridx), _mux_ofs, \
> > + _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > + _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, _ops) \
> > +
> > extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_clr_set_upd_ops;
> > extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops;
> >
> > @@ -67,6 +86,14 @@ extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops;
> > _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, \
> > mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops)
> >
> > +#define MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS_INDEXED(_id, _name, _parents, \
> > + _paridx, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, \
> > + _shift, _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags) \
> > + GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS_INDEXED(_id, _name, _parents, \
> > + _paridx, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, \
> > + _shift, _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, _flags, \
> > + mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops)
> > +
> > #define MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> > _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> > @@ -75,6 +102,14 @@ extern const struct clk_ops mtk_mux_gate_clr_set_upd_ops;
> > _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd, \
> > CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
> >
> > +#define MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_INDEXED(_id, _name, _parents, _paridx, \
> > + _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, \
> > + _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> > + MUX_GATE_CLR_SET_UPD_FLAGS_INDEXED(_id, _name, \
> > + _parents, _paridx, _mux_ofs, _mux_set_ofs, \
> > + _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, _gate, _upd_ofs, \
> > + _upd, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)
> > +
> > #define MUX_CLR_SET_UPD(_id, _name, _parents, _mux_ofs, \
> > _mux_set_ofs, _mux_clr_ofs, _shift, _width, \
> > _upd_ofs, _upd) \
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list