[PATCH v3 02/20] dt-bindings: clock: Add Google gs101 clock management unit bindings

[William McVicker]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 10/12/2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/10/2023 12:45, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/10/2023 10:56, Peter Griffin wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 07:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/10/2023 23:48, William McVicker wrote:
> >>>>> On 10/11/2023, Peter Griffin wrote:
> >>>>>> Provide dt-schema documentation for Google gs101 SoC clock controller.
> >>>>>> Currently this adds support for cmu_top, cmu_misc and cmu_apm.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin at linaro.org>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tested-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker at google.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> And how do you perform testing of a binding?
> >>>
> >>> I guess if William is using my script to build and flash the kernel it actually
> >>> runs the DTC checks as part of the build process.
> >>>
> >>> See https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/googlelt/pixelscripts/-/blob/clo/main/buildp21upstream.sh#L44
> >>
> >> So it is a build test? We do not consider building as a test procedure,
> >> otherwise I should add my and robots tested-by to many other patches.
> > 
> > Ok so I should only add the Tested-by on the .c patches?
> 
> In my opinion, if someone performs only build testing, it is not a
> testing. You cannot test the bindings other way than build testing, at
> least I do not know such way. Of course other code like C or DTS affects
> hardware so it can be tested.

What additional testing beside building and booting do you prefer at this
stage? I put my Tested-by for this patch because it includes the google,gs101.h
header which is used by the DT and clock controller driver during boot. Maybe
I should have been more clear on what I tested in each patch instead of only
mentioning how I tested in the cover letter?

Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,
Will

> 
> > 
> >> Shall I consider other Tested-by tags here also as build-tested only?
> > 
> > No. William indicated here
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZScZu-QB2LmB4CSM@google.com/T/#mbd96a26b725d6c85eb4193de8cd70ff277bc728e
> > that he booted it on his Oriole device.
> 
> 
> OK, I was just a bit confused.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>