[PATCH] OMAP/gpio: drop MPUIO static base

[Janusz Krzysztofik]

Hi Linus, Tony,

Dnia wtorek, 26 września 2023 09:09:53 CEST Tony Lindgren pisze:
> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> [230912 08:45]:
> > The OMAP GPIO driver hardcodes the MPIO chip base, but there
> > is no point: we have already moved all consumers over to using
> > descriptor look-ups.
> > 
> > Drop the MPUIO GPIO base and use dynamic assignment.

On my OMAP1510 based ams_delta with the patch applied on top of v6.6-rc4:

root at amsdelta:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/gpio 
gpiochip0: GPIOs 512-527, parent: platform/omap_gpio.0, mpuio:
 gpio-512 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-513 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-514 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-515 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-516 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-517 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-518 (                    |data                ) in  lo 
 gpio-519 (                    |data                ) in  lo 

gpiochip1: GPIOs 528-543, parent: platform/omap_gpio.1, gpio-0-15:
 gpio-528 (                    |keybrd_data         ) in  lo 
 gpio-529 (                    |keybrd_clk          ) in  lo IRQ 
 gpio-530 (                    |modem_irq           ) in  lo 
 gpio-532 (                    |hook_switch         ) in  hi IRQ 
 gpio-540 (                    |rdy                 ) in  hi 

gpiochip2: GPIOs 544-551, parent: platform/basic-mmio-gpio.0, latch1:
 gpio-544 (                    |camera              ) out lo 
...

GPIO based hardware seems to be working correctly.  I'm only not sure if 
we should maybe change the name to something else than gpio-0-15 (mpuio 
looks OK).

> > 
> > Root out the unused instances of the OMAP_MPUIO() macro and
> > delete the unused OMAP_GPIO_IS_MPUIO() macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Maybe Bartosz can merge this into the GPIO tree with Tony's
> > et al blessing?
> 
> Best to wait for Tested-by from Aaro on this one.
> 
> As far as I'm concerned, good to see this:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>

Tested-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20231004/e2d90c37/attachment.sig>