(subset) [PATCH RFC 0/5] Deprecate register_restart_handler()

[Gabriel L. Somlo]

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 04:48:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 10:10:01 -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> > Explanation is in patch #1.
> > 
> > The rest of this series is a set of representative examples of converting
> > away from the old API. They should be valid and can be taken by their
> > respective maintainers even if patch #1 doesn't find acceptance.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Andrew
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to
> 
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [4/5] spi: sprd: adi: Use devm_register_restart_handler()
>       commit: 8e6a43961f24cf841d3c0d199521d0b284d948b9

Any chance you can also pick up

[2/5] drivers/soc/litex: Use devm_register_restart_handler()

from this series?

I'm maintaining the LiteX (FPGA SoC) related drivers, but we don't as of
yet have a dedicated "path to upstream" of our own -- we've been mostly
going through specific subsystem trees (e.g. mmc, block, networking, etc.),
for mostly device drivers, up until now...

If not, no worries, I need to dedicate some time to figuring this out
eventually anyway :)

Thanks much,
--Gabriel

> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
> 
> You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
> and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
> send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
> 
> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> patches will not be replaced.
> 
> Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
> to this mail.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
>