[PATCH v3 4/6] thermal: sun8i: add syscon register access code

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Tue Nov 28 06:11:29 PST 2023


On 28/11/2023 10:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/11/2023 10:09, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:02 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:59 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:30 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28/11/2023 08:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 28/11/2023 01:58, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static struct regmap *sun8i_ths_get_syscon_regmap(struct device_node *node)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> +     struct device_node *syscon_node;
>>>>>>>> +     struct platform_device *syscon_pdev;
>>>>>>>> +     struct regmap *regmap = NULL;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +     syscon_node = of_parse_phandle(node, "syscon", 0);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. For the 100th time, this cannot be generic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +     if (!syscon_node)
>>>>>>>> +             return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +     syscon_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(syscon_node);
>>>>>>>> +     if (!syscon_pdev) {
>>>>>>>> +             /* platform device might not be probed yet */
>>>>>>>> +             regmap = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>>>>>>> +             goto out_put_node;
>>>>>>>> +     }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +     /* If no regmap is found then the other device driver is at fault */
>>>>>>>> +     regmap = dev_get_regmap(&syscon_pdev->dev, NULL);
>>>>>>>> +     if (!regmap)
>>>>>>>> +             regmap = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aren't you open-coding existing API to get regmap from syscon?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not really. This is to get a regmap exported by the device. Syscon's regmap
>>>>>> is not tied to the device at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am talking about open-coding existing API. Look at syscon.h.
>>>>
>>>> The underlying implementation is different.
>>>>
>>>> syscon maintains its own mapping of device nodes to regmaps, and creates
>>>> regmaps when none exist. The regmap is not tied to any struct device.
>>>> syscon basically exists outside of the driver model and one has no control
>>>> over what is exposed because it is meant for blocks that are a collection
>>>> of random stuff.
>>>
>>> My bad. I failed to realize there is a platform device driver for syscon,
>>> in addition to the existing "no struct device" implementation.
>>
>> Actually that doesn't do anything on DT platforms as of commit bdb0066df96e
>> ("mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from platform devices"). All the
>> regmaps are, as I previously stated, not tied to any struct device.
> 
> 
> Sorry, it's your third reply, so I don't know what exactly you want to
> discuss.
> 
> This code open-codes existing API. Fix it.
> 
>>
>>>> Here the provider device registers the (limited) regmap it wants to provide,
>>>> tying the new regmap to itself. The consumer gets it via the dev_get_regmap()
>>>> call. The provider has a main function and isn't exposing that part of its
>>>> register map to the outside; only the random bits that were stuffed in are.
>>>>
>>>>>> With this scheme a device to could export just enough registers for the
>>>>>> consumer to use, instead of the whole address range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We do this in the R40 clock controller as well, which has some bits that
>>>>>> tweak the ethernet controllers RGMII delay...
>>>>>
>>>>> Not related.
>>>>
>>>> Related as in that is possibly what this code was based on, commit
>>>> 49a06cae6e7c ("net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: Allow getting syscon regmap
>>>> from external device").
> 
> 
> How duplicating a code is related to R40 controller? Duplicating code is
> generic problem, not specific and not related to your hardware.

I think I understand now what you wanted to say - the "syscon" property
is pointing not to a syscon.

That's the mistake in the bindings - you claim it is a syscon, but it is
not and has nothing to do with syscon. Neither in the bindings nor in
the Linux drivers. This should be fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list