[PATCH 6/9] staging: vc04_services: Drop vchiq_log_error() in favour of dev_dbg

[Laurent Pinchart]

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 01:02:45PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 04:51:53AM -0500, Umang Jain wrote:
> > Drop vchiq_log_error() macro which wraps dev_dbg(). Introduce the usage
> > of dev_dbg() directly.
> > 
> > Add a new enum vchiq_log_type and log_type() helper to faciliate the
> > type of logging in dev_dbg(). This will help to determine the type of
> > logging("error", "warning", "debug", "trace") to dynamic debug.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           |  54 ++++----
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c     |   6 +-
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c          | 126 ++++++++++--------
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h          |  23 +++-
> >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c           |  47 ++++---
> >  5 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > index 9fb3e240d9de..2cb2a6503058 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > @@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ int vchiq_initialise(struct vchiq_instance **instance_out)
> >  
> >  	instance = kzalloc(sizeof(*instance), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!instance) {
> > -		vchiq_log_error(state->dev, VCHIQ_CORE,
> > -				"%s: error allocating vchiq instance\n", __func__);
> > +		dev_dbg(state->dev, "%s: %s: %s: error allocating vchiq instance\n",
> > +			log_cat(VCHIQ_CORE), log_type(ERROR), __func__);
> 
> All dev_dbg() calls have __func__ in them automatically, you never need
> to duplicate it again as that's redundant :(

Oh ? I didn't know that, and can't find it in the code. I may be missing
something though. Are you referring to the +f flag for dynamic debug
entries ? It won't work if dynamic debug isn't enabled though, but maybe
we don't care about that ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart