[PATCH v2 1/8] dma-buf: heaps: Initialize a secure heap
Jeffrey Kardatzke
jkardatzke at google.com
Wed Nov 15 15:18:32 PST 2023
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 3:16 AM Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Initialize a secure heap. Currently just add a null heap, Prepare for
> the later patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu at mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig | 7 +++
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/secure_heap.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/secure_heap.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig
> index a5eef06c4226..e358bf711145 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Kconfig
> @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ config DMABUF_HEAPS_CMA
> Choose this option to enable dma-buf CMA heap. This heap is backed
> by the Contiguous Memory Allocator (CMA). If your system has these
> regions, you should say Y here.
> +
> +config DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE
> + bool "DMA-BUF Secure Heap"
> + depends on DMABUF_HEAPS && TEE
> + help
> + Choose this option to enable dma-buf secure heap. This heap is backed by
> + TEE client interfaces or CMA. If in doubt, say N.
Remove the mention of TEE and CMA from this.
You should probably add two KConfig options. One is for
DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE which is for the framework for secure heaps. The
other one should be:
config MTK_DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE
bool "Mediatek DMA-BUF Secure Heap"
depends on DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE && TEE
help
Enables secure dma-buf heaps for Mediatek platforms.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile
> index 974467791032..b1ad9d1f2fbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE) += secure_heap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_SYSTEM) += system_heap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DMABUF_HEAPS_CMA) += cma_heap.o
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/secure_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/secure_heap.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a634051a0a67
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/secure_heap.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * DMABUF secure heap exporter
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 MediaTek Inc.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-heap.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +enum secure_memory_type {
> + /*
> + * MediaTek static chunk memory carved out for TrustZone. The memory
> + * management is inside the TEE.
> + */
> + SECURE_MEMORY_TYPE_MTK_CM_TZ = 1,
Mediatek specific code for secure dma heaps should go into a new file
(maybe secure_heap_mtk.c which the MTK_DMABUF_HEAPS_SECURE option
enables).
> +};
> +
> +struct secure_buffer {
> + struct dma_heap *heap;
> + size_t size;
> +};
> +
> +struct secure_heap {
> + const char *name;
> + const enum secure_memory_type mem_type;
secure_memory_type is going to be in the vendor specific
implementation, I don't think you need it in the framework.
> +};
You should probably move these to a <linux/dma-heap-secure.h> file so
they can be shared by the framework and the specific implementation
(in this case vendor specific).
> +
> +static struct dma_buf *
> +secure_heap_allocate(struct dma_heap *heap, unsigned long size,
> + unsigned long fd_flags, unsigned long heap_flags)
> +{
> + struct secure_buffer *sec_buf;
> + DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(exp_info);
> + struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> + int ret;
> +
> + sec_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(*sec_buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!sec_buf)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + sec_buf->size = ALIGN(size, PAGE_SIZE);
> + sec_buf->heap = heap;
> +
> + exp_info.exp_name = dma_heap_get_name(heap);
> + exp_info.size = sec_buf->size;
> + exp_info.flags = fd_flags;
> + exp_info.priv = sec_buf;
> +
> + dmabuf = dma_buf_export(&exp_info);
> + if (IS_ERR(dmabuf)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(dmabuf);
> + goto err_free_buf;
> + }
> +
> + return dmabuf;
> +
> +err_free_buf:
> + kfree(sec_buf);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dma_heap_ops sec_heap_ops = {
> + .allocate = secure_heap_allocate,
> +};
> +
> +static struct secure_heap secure_heaps[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "secure_mtk_cm",
> + .mem_type = SECURE_MEMORY_TYPE_MTK_CM_TZ,
> + },
> +};
Move this to the vendor specific implementation.
> +
> +static int secure_heap_init(void)
> +{
> + struct secure_heap *sec_heap = secure_heaps;
> + struct dma_heap_export_info exp_info;
> + struct dma_heap *heap;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(secure_heaps); i++, sec_heap++) {
> + exp_info.name = sec_heap->name;
> + exp_info.ops = &sec_heap_ops;
> + exp_info.priv = (void *)sec_heap;
> +
> + heap = dma_heap_add(&exp_info);
> + if (IS_ERR(heap))
> + return PTR_ERR(heap);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
secure_heap_init should take a 'struct secure_heap*' as an argument
and be defined in dma-heap-secure.h.
> +
> +module_init(secure_heap_init);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Secure Heap Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Remove from this file, it should go in the specific implementations.
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list