[PATCH 52/52] serial: xilinx_uartps: Convert to platform remove callback returning void

Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Mon Nov 13 06:31:04 PST 2023


On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:03:42AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/10/23 16:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> > > many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> > > returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
> > > from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
> > > 
> > > To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
> > > void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
> > > .remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
> > > are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
> > > 
> > > Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> > > callback to the void returning variant.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 5 ++---
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> > > index 66a45a634158..6decf2b13340 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c
> > > @@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ static int cdns_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >    *
> > >    * Return: 0 on success, negative errno otherwise
> > 
> > this line should be also removed.
> 
> Good catch.
> 
> @gregkh: What is the preferred way to address that? I can follow up with
> a patch on top of this one (and you squash it or not), I can send a
> patch that gets that does the conversion and drops the comment (and you
> skip this incomplete patch when applying this series) or I can resend
> the whole series in a week or so.

Follow-on patch is fine, I'll take this whole series in a week when I
catch up from the merge-window-backlog as I'm at the Plumbers conference
this week...

thanks,

greg k-h



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list