[PATCH RFC 02/17] of: Do not return struct iommu_ops from of_iommu_configure()
Jerry Snitselaar
jsnitsel at redhat.com
Fri Nov 3 14:47:35 PDT 2023
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 02:42:01PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:44:47PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Nothing needs this pointer. Return a normal error code with the usual
> > IOMMU semantic that ENODEV means 'there is no IOMMU driver'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/of/device.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> > include/linux/of_iommu.h | 13 ++++++-------
> > 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > index 157b286e36bf3a..e2fa29c16dd758 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > @@ -107,20 +107,26 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_device(struct device_node *master_np,
> > of_iommu_configure_dev(master_np, dev);
> > }
> >
> > -const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
> > - struct device_node *master_np,
> > - const u32 *id)
> > +/*
> > + * Returns:
> > + * 0 on success, an iommu was configured
> > + * -ENODEV if the device does not have any IOMMU
> > + * -EPROBEDEFER if probing should be tried again
> > + * -errno fatal errors
>
> It looks to me like it will only return 0, -ENODEV, or -EPROBEDEFER
> with other -errno getting boiled down to -ENODEV.
>
Ah, I should've looked at the next patch first. So, never mind on this
and the question about the dev_dbg.
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel at redhat.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list