[PATCH v2 3/8] media: videobuf2: Add a module param to limit vb2 queue buffer storage
Hans Verkuil
hverkuil-cisco at xs4all.nl
Tue May 30 23:36:59 PDT 2023
On 21/03/2023 11:28, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Add module parameter "max_vb_buffer_per_queue" to be able to limit
> the number of vb2 buffers store in queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard at collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 15 +++------------
> include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> index ae9d72f4d181..f4da917ccf3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> static int debug;
> module_param(debug, int, 0644);
>
> +module_param(max_vb_buffer_per_queue, ulong, 0644);
There is no MODULE_PARM_DESC here? Please add. I see it is not there for
the debug param either, it should be added for that as well.
Regards,
Hans
> +
> #define dprintk(q, level, fmt, arg...) \
> do { \
> if (debug >= level) \
> @@ -412,10 +414,6 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
> struct vb2_buffer *vb;
> int ret;
>
> - /* Ensure that q->num_buffers+num_buffers is below VB2_MAX_FRAME */
> - num_buffers = min_t(unsigned int, num_buffers,
> - VB2_MAX_FRAME - q->num_buffers);
> -
> for (buffer = 0; buffer < num_buffers; ++buffer) {
> /* Allocate vb2 buffer structures */
> vb = kzalloc(q->buf_struct_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -801,9 +799,7 @@ int vb2_core_reqbufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
> /*
> * Make sure the requested values and current defaults are sane.
> */
> - WARN_ON(q->min_buffers_needed > VB2_MAX_FRAME);
> num_buffers = max_t(unsigned int, *count, q->min_buffers_needed);
> - num_buffers = min_t(unsigned int, num_buffers, VB2_MAX_FRAME);
> memset(q->alloc_devs, 0, sizeof(q->alloc_devs));
> /*
> * Set this now to ensure that drivers see the correct q->memory value
> @@ -919,11 +915,6 @@ int vb2_core_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
> bool no_previous_buffers = !q->num_buffers;
> int ret;
>
> - if (q->num_buffers == VB2_MAX_FRAME) {
> - dprintk(q, 1, "maximum number of buffers already allocated\n");
> - return -ENOBUFS;
> - }
> -
> if (no_previous_buffers) {
> if (q->waiting_in_dqbuf && *count) {
> dprintk(q, 1, "another dup()ped fd is waiting for a buffer\n");
> @@ -948,7 +939,7 @@ int vb2_core_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - num_buffers = min(*count, VB2_MAX_FRAME - q->num_buffers);
> + num_buffers = *count;
>
> if (requested_planes && requested_sizes) {
> num_planes = requested_planes;
> diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> index 397dbf6e61e1..b8b34a993e04 100644
> --- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #ifndef _MEDIA_VIDEOBUF2_CORE_H
> #define _MEDIA_VIDEOBUF2_CORE_H
>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/poll.h>
> @@ -48,6 +49,8 @@ struct vb2_fileio_data;
> struct vb2_threadio_data;
> struct vb2_buffer;
>
> +static size_t max_vb_buffer_per_queue = 1024;
> +
> /**
> * struct vb2_mem_ops - memory handling/memory allocator operations.
> * @alloc: allocate video memory and, optionally, allocator private data,
> @@ -1268,12 +1271,16 @@ static inline bool vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *
>
> if (vb->index >= q->max_num_bufs) {
> struct vb2_buffer **tmp;
> + int cnt = min(max_vb_buffer_per_queue, q->max_num_bufs * 2);
> +
> + if (cnt >= q->max_num_bufs)
> + goto realloc_failed;
>
> - tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, q->max_num_bufs * 2, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
> + tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, cnt, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tmp)
> goto realloc_failed;
>
> - q->max_num_bufs *= 2;
> + q->max_num_bufs = cnt;
> q->bufs = tmp;
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list