[PATCH 02/11] pinctrl: stm32: add stm32mp257 pinctrl support

[Conor Dooley]

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 10:38:30AM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Conor
> 
> On 5/29/23 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:20:25PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> > > Add stm32mp257 pinctrl support.
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h
> > > index e0c31c4c8bca..5e5de92ddd58 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.h
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> > >   #define STM32MP_PKG_AB		BIT(1)
> > >   #define STM32MP_PKG_AC		BIT(2)
> > >   #define STM32MP_PKG_AD		BIT(3)
> > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AI		BIT(8)
> > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AK		BIT(10)
> > > +#define STM32MP_PKG_AL		BIT(11)
> > 
> > Mainly out of curiosity, why have you go duplicate defines for these?
> 
> Mainly to fit with available packages for various STM32 MPU. Currently MP1
> SoCs are available with packages AB/AC/AD and MP2 series with AI/AK/AL but
> in the future we could have package AB/AC/AD/AI available for a particular
> SoC and then I need to anticipate this case.

Sorry, what I meant was "why have you got defines for these in this
header, when there is an existing set in
include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/stm32-pinfunc.h?".

Cheers,
Conor.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230530/1c82c42d/attachment-0001.sig>