[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Use different pointer authentication keys for pKVM
Mostafa Saleh
smostafa at google.com
Mon May 29 04:17:51 PDT 2023
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 08:47:52PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 02:15:31PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > When the kernel is compiled with CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL, it
> > uses Armv8.3-Pauth for return address protection for the kernel code
> > including nvhe code in EL2.
> >
> > Same keys are used in both kernel(EL1) and nvhe code(EL2), this is
> > fine for nvhe but not when running in protected mode(pKVM) as the host
> > can't be trusted.
>
> But we trust it enough to hand pKVM a fresh set of keys before firing
> off? I understand there is some degree of initialization required to get
> pKVM off the ground, but I question in this case if key handoff is
> strictly necessary.
>
> There are potentially other sources of random directly available at EL2,
> such as the SMCCC TRNG ABI or FEAT_RNG. Should pKVM prefer one of these
> random implementations and only fall back to host-provided keys if
> absolutely necessary?
>
According to my understanding, the kernel is still completely trusted at
this point (it sets the initial page table for the hypervisor), so I
believe it should be fine to trust it for ptrauth keys. However, I agree,
it would be better if the hypervisor can get its own keys through
firmware/hardware if supported. I will add this in V2.
> > The keys for the hypervisor are generated from the kernel before it
> > de-privileges, each cpu has different keys, this relies on nvhe code
> > not being migratable while running.
> >
> > This patch adds host/hyp save/restore for the keys.
> > For guest/hyp, they are already handled in common kvm code in
> > __guest_enter, where they are saved/restored if they are not
> > trapped.
>
> Try to avoid "this patch" or any self-referential language in the
> changelog. Just directly state what the patch does:
>
> Similar to guest entry/exit, start context switching the pointer
>
I will update it in V2.
Thanks,
Mostafa
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list