[PATCH V4 4/6] coresight: etm4x: Change etm4_platform_driver driver for MMIO devices

Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Thu May 25 14:23:49 PDT 2023


Hi Anshuman

Please find a minor issue with the clock handling below.

On 23/05/2023 05:45, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Add support for handling MMIO based devices via platform driver. We need to
> make sure that :
> 
> 1) The APB clock, if present is enabled at probe and via runtime_pm ops
> 2) Use the ETM4x architecture or CoreSight architecture registers to
>     identify a device as CoreSight ETM4x, instead of relying a white list of
>     "Peripheral IDs"
> 
> The driver doesn't get to handle the devices yet, until we wire the ACPI
> changes to move the devices to be handled via platform driver than the
> etm4_amba driver.
> 
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> Cc: coresight at lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
> ---
>   .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c          | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h |  4 ++
>   include/linux/coresight.h                     | 47 +++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> index 57a7181017bd..c9e2219ee6b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>   #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>   #include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/barrier.h>
>   #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -1073,11 +1074,21 @@ static bool etm4_init_sysreg_access(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
>   	return true;
>   }
>   
> +static bool is_devtype_cpu_trace(void __iomem *base)
> +{
> +	u32 devtype = readl(base + TRCDEVTYPE);
> +
> +	return (devtype == CS_DEVTYPE_PE_TRACE);
> +}
> +
>   static bool etm4_init_iomem_access(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata,
>   				   struct csdev_access *csa)
>   {
>   	u32 devarch = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TRCDEVARCH);
>   
> +	if (!is_coresight_device(drvdata->base) || !is_devtype_cpu_trace(drvdata->base))
> +		return false;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * All ETMs must implement TRCDEVARCH to indicate that
>   	 * the component is an ETMv4. Even though TRCIDR1 also
> @@ -2135,6 +2146,7 @@ static int etm4_probe_amba(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>   
>   static int etm4_probe_platform_dev(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> +	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>   	struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata;
>   	int ret;
>   
> @@ -2142,7 +2154,18 @@ static int etm4_probe_platform_dev(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!drvdata)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -	drvdata->base = NULL;
> +	drvdata->pclk = coresight_get_enable_apb_pclk(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pclk))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (res) {
> +		drvdata->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +		if (IS_ERR(drvdata->base)) {
> +			clk_put(drvdata->pclk);

clk_put() can handle drvdata->pclk == NULL and bail out early. So 
calling this without the != NULL check is fine.

> +			return PTR_ERR(drvdata->base);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>   	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
>   	pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>   	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -2188,7 +2211,7 @@ static struct amba_cs_uci_id uci_id_etm4[] = {
>   		/*  ETMv4 UCI data */
>   		.devarch	= ETM_DEVARCH_ETMv4x_ARCH,
>   		.devarch_mask	= ETM_DEVARCH_ID_MASK,
> -		.devtype	= 0x00000013,
> +		.devtype	= CS_DEVTYPE_PE_TRACE,
>   	}
>   };
>   
> @@ -2247,6 +2270,9 @@ static int __exit etm4_remove_platform_dev(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (drvdata)
>   		ret = etm4_remove_dev(drvdata);
>   	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	if (drvdata->pclk)
> +		clk_put(drvdata->pclk);
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> @@ -2286,6 +2312,32 @@ static struct amba_driver etm4x_amba_driver = {
>   	.id_table	= etm4_ids,
>   };
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int etm4_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(drvdata->pclk))
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->pclk);

However this seems to be inconsistent. Should we not use:

	if (drvdata->pclk)
		...

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int etm4_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(drvdata->pclk))

same as above ?

> +		clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops etm4_dev_pm_ops = {
> +	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(etm4_runtime_suspend, etm4_runtime_resume, NULL)
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id etm4_sysreg_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible	= "arm,coresight-etm4x-sysreg" },
>   	{ .compatible	= "arm,embedded-trace-extension" },
> @@ -2299,6 +2351,7 @@ static struct platform_driver etm4_platform_driver = {
>   		.name			= "coresight-etm4x",
>   		.of_match_table		= etm4_sysreg_match,
>   		.suppress_bind_attrs	= true,
> +		.pm			= &etm4_dev_pm_ops,
>   	},
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> index 27c8a9901868..0ff0bd2cd504 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h
> @@ -701,6 +701,8 @@
>   #define ETM_DEVARCH_ETE_ARCH						\
>   	(ETM_DEVARCH_ARCHITECT_ARM | ETM_DEVARCH_ARCHID_ETE | ETM_DEVARCH_PRESENT)
>   
> +#define CS_DEVTYPE_PE_TRACE		0x00000013
> +
>   #define TRCSTATR_IDLE_BIT		0
>   #define TRCSTATR_PMSTABLE_BIT		1
>   #define ETM_DEFAULT_ADDR_COMP		0
> @@ -944,6 +946,7 @@ struct etmv4_save_state {
>   
>   /**
>    * struct etm4_drvdata - specifics associated to an ETM component
> + * @pclk        APB clock for this component

Might be worth adding the comment here :

      * @pclk:	    APB clock if present, otherwise NULL

Rest looks fine to me

Suzuki



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list