[PATCH v9 2/5] KVM: arm64: Use per guest ID register for ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.[CSV2|CSV3]

Jing Zhang jingzhangos at google.com
Mon May 22 10:23:34 PDT 2023


Hi Reiji,

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 4:52 PM Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jing,
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 06:10:11AM +0000, Jing Zhang wrote:
> > With per guest ID registers, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.[CSV2|CSV3] settings from
> > userspace can be stored in its corresponding ID register.
> >
> > The setting of CSV bits for protected VMs are removed according to the
> > discussion from Fuad below:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+EHjTwXA9TprX4jeG+-D+c8v9XG+oFdU1o6TSkvVye145_OvA@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > Besides the removal of CSV bits setting for protected VMs, No other
> > functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 --
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              | 17 ----------
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 949a4a782844..07f0e091ae48 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -257,8 +257,6 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> >
> >       cpumask_var_t supported_cpus;
> >
> > -     u8 pfr0_csv2;
> > -     u8 pfr0_csv3;
> >       struct {
> >               u8 imp:4;
> >               u8 unimp:4;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > index 774656a0718d..5114521ace60 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > @@ -102,22 +102,6 @@ static int kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus(void)
> >       return vgic_present ? kvm_vgic_get_max_vcpus() : KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void set_default_spectre(struct kvm *kvm)
> > -{
> > -     /*
> > -      * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
> > -      * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
> > -      * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
> > -      *
> > -      * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
> > -      * the impossible.
> > -      */
> > -     if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
> > -             kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = 1;
> > -     if (arm64_get_meltdown_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED)
> > -             kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3 = 1;
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * kvm_arch_init_vm - initializes a VM data structure
> >   * @kvm:     pointer to the KVM struct
> > @@ -161,7 +145,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> >       /* The maximum number of VCPUs is limited by the host's GIC model */
> >       kvm->max_vcpus = kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus();
> >
> > -     set_default_spectre(kvm);
> >       kvm_arm_init_hypercalls(kvm);
> >       kvm_arm_init_id_regs(kvm);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index d2ee3a1c7f03..3c52b136ade3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -1218,10 +1218,6 @@ static u64 kvm_arm_read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 id)
> >               if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> >                       val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE);
> >               val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU);
> > -             val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2);
> > -             val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2);
> > -             val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3);
> > -             val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3), (u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3);
> >               if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V3) {
> >                       val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_GIC);
> >                       val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_GIC), 1);
> > @@ -1359,7 +1355,10 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >                              const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> >                              u64 val)
> >  {
> > +     struct kvm_arch *arch = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
> > +     u64 sval = val;
> >       u8 csv2, csv3;
> > +     int ret = 0;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Allow AA64PFR0_EL1.CSV2 to be set from userspace as long as
> > @@ -1377,17 +1376,26 @@ static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >           (csv3 && arm64_get_meltdown_state() != SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED))
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > +     mutex_lock(&arch->config_lock);
> >       /* We can only differ with CSV[23], and anything else is an error */
> >       val ^= read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> >       val &= ~(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2) |
> >                ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3));
> > -     if (val)
> > -             return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > -     vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv2 = csv2;
> > -     vcpu->kvm->arch.pfr0_csv3 = csv3;
> > +     if (val) {
> > +             ret = -EINVAL;
> > +             goto out;
> > +     }
> >
> > -     return 0;
> > +     /* Only allow userspace to change the idregs before VM running */
> > +     if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_HAS_RAN_ONCE, &vcpu->kvm->arch.flags)) {
>
> How about using kvm_vm_has_ran_once() instead ?
Sure.
>
>
> > +             if (sval != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd))
>
> Rather than calling read_id_reg() twice in this function,
> perhaps you might want to save the original val we got earlier
> and re-use it here ?
Will do.
>
> Thank you,
> Reiji
>
>
>
>
> > +                     ret = -EBUSY;
> > +     } else {
> > +             IDREG(vcpu->kvm, reg_to_encoding(rd)) = sval;
> > +     }
> > +out:
> > +     mutex_unlock(&arch->config_lock);
> > +     return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > @@ -1479,7 +1487,12 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> >                     u64 *val)
> >  {
> > +     struct kvm_arch *arch = &vcpu->kvm->arch;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(&arch->config_lock);
> >       *val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd);
> > +     mutex_unlock(&arch->config_lock);
> > +
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -3364,6 +3377,7 @@ void kvm_arm_init_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  {
> >       const struct sys_reg_desc *idreg;
> >       struct sys_reg_params params;
> > +     u64 val;
> >       u32 id;
> >
> >       /* Find the first idreg (SYS_ID_PFR0_EL1) in sys_reg_descs. */
> > @@ -3386,6 +3400,27 @@ void kvm_arm_init_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
> >               idreg++;
> >               id = reg_to_encoding(idreg);
> >       }
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * The default is to expose CSV2 == 1 if the HW isn't affected.
> > +      * Although this is a per-CPU feature, we make it global because
> > +      * asymmetric systems are just a nuisance.
> > +      *
> > +      * Userspace can override this as long as it doesn't promise
> > +      * the impossible.
> > +      */
> > +     val = IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
> > +
> > +     if (arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > +             val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2);
> > +             val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV2), 1);
> > +     }
> > +     if (arm64_get_meltdown_state() == SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED) {
> > +             val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3);
> > +             val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_CSV3), 1);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     IDREG(kvm, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) = val;
> >  }
> >
> >  int __init kvm_sys_reg_table_init(void)
> > --
> > 2.40.1.606.ga4b1b128d6-goog
> >
Thanks,
Jing



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list