[PATCH v2 1/4] spi: dt-bindings: Introduce spi-mosi-idle-low flag

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Börge Strümpfel wrote:
> Am Fr., 12. Mai 2023 um 05:30 Uhr schrieb Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>:

> > If this is always required for a given device (which I'd expect to be
> > the case) why configure it through DT?  I know we've got some legacy
> > stuff like that but not all legacy DT choices were good and no need to
> > continue the pattern.

> Yes this will always be the case for specific spi-device, spi-controller
> combinations. Just to make sure, that I understand your suggestion
> correctly: You propose to check from the specific spi-device-driver, if
> the spi-controller supports this particular mode-bit, and then set it if
> it does and thereby loose the need for the DT entry completely?

Yes, we shouldn't need DT here.  Though the device should just be
setting this unconditionally if it's always required.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230515/ae24dd0c/attachment.sig>