[PATCH] clk: imx: composite-8m: Add imx8m_divider_determine_rate
Adam Ford
aford173 at gmail.com
Thu May 11 20:03:23 PDT 2023
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 2:53 PM Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, certain clocks are derrived as a divider from their
> parent clock. For some clocks, even when CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
> is set, the parent clock is not properly set which can lead
> to some relatively inaccurate clock values.
>
> Unlike imx/clk-composite-93 and imx/clk-divider-gate, it
> cannot rely on calling a standard determine_rate function,
> because the 8m composite clocks have a pre-divider and
> post-divider. Because of this, a custom determine_rate
> function is necessary to determine the maximum clock
> division which is equivalent to pre-divider * the
> post-divider.
>
> With this added, the system can attempt to adjust the parent rate
> when the proper flags are set which can lead to a more precise clock
> value.
>
> On the imx8mplus, no clock changes are present.
> On the Mini and Nano, this can help achieve more accurate
> lcdif clocks. When trying to get a pixel clock of 31.500MHz
> on an imx8m Nano, the clocks divided the 594MHz down, but
> left the parent rate untouched which caused a calulation error.
>
> Before:
> video_pll 594000000
> video_pll_bypass 594000000
> video_pll_out 594000000
> disp_pixel 31263158
> disp_pixel_clk 31263158
>
> Variance = -236842 Hz
>
> After this patch:
> video_pll 31500000
> video_pll_bypass 31500000
> video_pll_out 31500000
> disp_pixel 31500000
> disp_pixel_clk 31500000
>
> Variance = 0 Hz
>
> All other clocks rates and parent were the same.
> Similar results on imx8mm were found.
>
Peng / Abel,
I was curious if either of you might have time to review this attempt
at enabling determine_rate on the 8m's. I tested this on the 8mm,
8mn, and 8mp, and found no regressions.
adam
> Fixes: 690dccc4a0bf ("Revert "clk: imx: composite-8m: Add support to determine_rate"")
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> ---
> V2: Fix build warning found by build bot and fix prediv_value
> and div_value because the values stored are the divisor - 1,
> so we need to add 1 to the values to be correct.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> index cbf0d7955a00..7a6e3ce97133 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-composite-8m.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,41 @@ static int imx8m_clk_composite_divider_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int imx8m_divider_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + struct clk_rate_request *req)
> +{
> + struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
> + int prediv_value;
> + int div_value;
> +
> + /* if read only, just return current value */
> + if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY) {
> + u32 val;
> +
> + val = readl(divider->reg);
> + prediv_value = val >> divider->shift;
> + prediv_value &= clk_div_mask(divider->width);
> + prediv_value++;
> +
> + div_value = val >> PCG_DIV_SHIFT;
> + div_value &= clk_div_mask(PCG_DIV_WIDTH);
> + div_value++;
> +
> + return divider_ro_determine_rate(hw, req, divider->table,
> + PCG_PREDIV_WIDTH + PCG_DIV_WIDTH,
> + divider->flags, prediv_value * div_value);
> + }
> +
> + return divider_determine_rate(hw, req, divider->table,
> + PCG_PREDIV_WIDTH + PCG_DIV_WIDTH,
> + divider->flags);
> +}
> +
> static const struct clk_ops imx8m_clk_composite_divider_ops = {
> .recalc_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_recalc_rate,
> .round_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_round_rate,
> .set_rate = imx8m_clk_composite_divider_set_rate,
> + .determine_rate = imx8m_divider_determine_rate,
> };
>
> static u8 imx8m_clk_composite_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> --
> 2.39.2
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list