[PATCH] arm64: mte: Do not set PG_mte_tagged if tags were not initialized
Alexandru Elisei
alexandru.elisei at arm.com
Tue May 9 05:09:27 PDT 2023
Hi Peter,
Regardless of the nitpick below, the patch looks correct to me:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 02:43:27PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> The mte_sync_page_tags() function sets PG_mte_tagged if it initializes
> page tags. Then we return to mte_sync_tags(), which sets PG_mte_tagged
> again. At best, this is redundant. However, it is possible for
> mte_sync_page_tags() to return without having initialized tags for the
> page, i.e. in the case where check_swap is true (non-compound page),
> is_swap_pte(old_pte) is false and pte_is_tagged is false. So at worst,
> we set PG_mte_tagged on a page with uninitialized tags. This can happen
> if, for example, page migration causes a PTE for an untagged page to
> be replaced. If the userspace program subsequently uses mprotect() to
> enable PROT_MTE for that page, the uninitialized tags will be exposed
> to userspace.
>
> Fix it by removing the redundant call to set_page_mte_tagged().
>
> Fixes: e059853d14ca ("arm64: mte: Fix/clarify the PG_mte_tagged semantics")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc at google.com>
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # 6.1
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Ib02d004d435b2ed87603b858ef7480f7b1463052
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> index f5bcb0dc6267..7e89968bd282 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> @@ -66,13 +66,10 @@ void mte_sync_tags(pte_t old_pte, pte_t pte)
> return;
>
> /* if PG_mte_tagged is set, tags have already been initialised */
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++) {
> - if (!page_mte_tagged(page)) {
Both braces could have been kept (they define multiline blocks), and as a
bonus the diff becomes only one line removed. Not sure that's worth a
respin.
Thanks,
Alex
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++)
> + if (!page_mte_tagged(page))
> mte_sync_page_tags(page, old_pte, check_swap,
> pte_is_tagged);
> - set_page_mte_tagged(page);
> - }
> - }
>
> /* ensure the tags are visible before the PTE is set */
> smp_wmb();
> --
> 2.40.0.634.g4ca3ef3211-goog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list