[PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Fix wakeup pinmux range and pinctrl node offsets

Thejasvi Konduru t-konduru at ti.com
Tue May 9 02:49:40 PDT 2023


On 04/05/23 19:52, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:40-20230504, Thejasvi Konduru wrote:
>> On 04/05/23 17:22, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 14:36-20230504, Thejasvi Konduru wrote:
>>>> On 03/05/23 17:16, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>>> On 14:01-20230503, Thejasvi Konduru wrote:
>>>>>> The wkup_pmx register region in j784s4 has multiple non-addressable
>>>>>> regions, hence the existing wkup_pmx region is split as follows to
>>>>>> avoid the non-addressable regions. The pinctrl node offsets are
>>>>>> also corrected as per the newly split wkup_pmx* nodes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wkup_pmx0 -> 13 pins (WKUP_PADCONFIG 0 - 12)
>>>>>> wkup_pmx1 -> 11 pins (WKUP_PADCONFIG 14 - 24)
>>>>>> wkup_pmx2 -> 72 pins (WKUP_PADCONFIG 26 - 97)
>>>>>> wkup_pmx3 -> 1 pin (WKUP_PADCONFIG 100)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixes: 4664ebd8346a ("arm64: dts: ti: Add initial support for J784S4 SoC")
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thejasvi Konduru <t-konduru at ti.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>> Could you provide a link to the output of:
>>>>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/pinctrl/*/pins
>>>> https://gist.github.com/thejasvikonduru/05b1a8e0fd8176116b7a3cc4e43b244a
>>> Was this failing prior to this patch? Trying to understand the "Fix"
>>> aspect of this patch.
>>>
>> Yes,it was failing prior to this patch.
>>
> next time some asks this question - give summary AND give a log. Even
> better, please don't make folks even ask the question in the first
> place by including the logs in the diffstat of the patch.
>
> Please share the log to understand what kind of "failure" was occurring.

Link to logs:
Before Fix: https://gist.github.com/thejasvikonduru/e217edf4839c348793a5671aa9331595
After Fix : https://gist.github.com/thejasvikonduru/05b1a8e0fd8176116b7a3cc4e43b244a

>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list