[PATCH v4 21/21] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 09/05/2023 11:37, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:31:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/05/2023 18:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2023 13:38, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>>> Convert the Rockchip DFI binding to yaml. While at it add the newly
>>>> supported rk3568-dfi to the binding.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
>>>
>>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
>>> and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
>>> kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
>>> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>>>
>>> You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested.
>>> Please resend and include all necessary entries.
>>>
>>
>> Actually you already got such comments and nothing improved here. You
>> just resend same patch with same bugs.
>>
>> This is a waste of our time. Ignoring output of maintainers means there
>> is no testing and the patch does not appear in the inboxes.
>>
>> I don't understand why you insist on ignoring that output.
> 
> I skipped the device tree list because there was no change in the dts or
> binding part compared to the previous version.

Please always CC DT list and all maintainers. Just because something did
not change here, does not mean that nothing changed elsewhere, e.g. in
dependant schemas.

What's more, the binding should have changed because I asked to fix
several things.

> 
> But ok, it's worse. I only *intended* to not change the dts/binding
> part. In fact I did, because the things you mentioned were already fixed
> in an earlier version and I indeed ran dtbs_check and dt_binding_check on
> this ealier version.
> 
> Somehow old patches sneaked into this series. Sorry for that, I'll send
> a new version once I sorted this out.
> 
> Sascha
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof