[PATCH RFC v6 2/6] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Fri May 5 08:35:31 PDT 2023
On Fri, 5 May 2023 12:41:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >connector label (i.e. front panel label)? Or also applicable to
> >internal pins? It'd be easier to talk details if we had the user
> >facing documentation that ships with these products.
>
> I think is is use case specific. Some of the pins face the user over
> physical port, they it is a front panel label. Others are internal
> names. I have no clue how to define and mainly enforce rules here.
It should be pretty easy to judge if we see the user-facing
documentation vendors have.
> But as an example, if you have 2 pins of the same type, only difference
> is they are connected to front panel connector "A" and "B", this is the
> label you have to pass to the ID query. Do you see any other way?
Sound perfectly fine, if it's a front panel label, let's call
the attribute DPLL_A_PIN_FRONT_PANEL_LABEL. If the pin is not
brought out to the front panel it will not have this attr.
For other type of labels we should have different attributes.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list