[PATCH v2 2/5] perf vendor events: Add JSON metrics for CMN-700
John Garry
john.g.garry at oracle.com
Mon May 1 05:27:31 PDT 2023
On 24/04/2023 10:44, Jing Zhang wrote:
> Add JSON metrics for CMN-700. Currently just add part of CMN-700 PMU
> metrics which are general and compatible for any SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> .../arch/arm64/arm/cmn700/sys/metrics.json | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn700/sys/metrics.json
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn700/sys/metrics.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn700/sys/metrics.json
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..1577d86
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm/cmn700/sys/metrics.json
I suppose putting these here is ok. Are all these events a must for a
CMN-700 implementation? Is there potential for impdef event in some
implementations?
Previously we considered ARM PMCG events would be put in a per-SoC sys
folder only (and not in perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/arm)
> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> +[
> + {
> + "MetricName": "slc_miss_rate",
> + "BriefDescription": "The system level cache miss rate include.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "hnf_cache_miss / hnf_slc_sf_cache_access",
> + "ScaleUnit": "100%",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "hnf_message_retry_rate",
> + "BriefDescription": "HN-F message retry rate indicates whether a lack of credits is causing the bottlenecks.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "hnf_pocq_retry / hnf_pocq_reqs_recvd",
> + "ScaleUnit": "100%",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "sf_hit_rate",
> + "BriefDescription": "Snoop filter hit rate can be used to measure the Snoop Filter efficiency.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "hnf_sf_hit / hnf_slc_sf_cache_access",
> + "ScaleUnit": "100%",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "mc_message_retry_rate",
> + "BriefDescription": "The memory controller request retries rate indicates whether the memory controller is the bottleneck.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "hnf_mc_retries / hnf_mc_reqs",
> + "ScaleUnit": "100%",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "rni_actual_read_bandwidth.all",
> + "BriefDescription": "This event measure the actual bandwidth(MB/sec) that RN-I bridge sends to the interconnect.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "rnid_rxdat_flits * 32 / 1e6 / duration_time",
> + "ScaleUnit": "1MB/s",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "rni_actual_write_bandwidth.all",
> + "BriefDescription": "This event measures the actual write bandwidth(MB/sec) at RN-I bridges.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "rnid_txdat_flits * 32 / 1e6 / duration_time",
> + "ScaleUnit": "1MB/s",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "rni_retry_rate",
> + "BriefDescription": "RN-I bridge retry rate indicates whether the memory controller is the bottleneck.",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "rnid_txreq_flits_retried / rnid_txreq_flits_total",
> + "ScaleUnit": "100%",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + },
> + {
> + "MetricName": "sbsx_actual_write_bandwidth.all",
> + "BriefDescription": "sbsx actual write bandwidth(MB/sec).",
> + "MetricGroup": "cmn700",
> + "MetricExpr": "sbsx_txdat_flitv * 32 / 1e6 / duration_time",
> + "ScaleUnit": "1MB/s",
> + "Unit": "arm_cmn",
> + "Compat": "cmn700"
> + }
> +]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py
> index 2bcd07c..7cff2c6 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.py
> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ class JsonEvent:
> 'DFPMC': 'amd_df',
> 'cpu_core': 'cpu_core',
> 'cpu_atom': 'cpu_atom',
> + 'arm_cmn': 'arm_cmn',
> }
> return table[unit] if unit in table else f'uncore_{unit.lower()}'
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list