[PATCH v7 09/12] arm64: dts: rockchip: a64: Add endpoint at 0 to dsi_in_tcon0

[Maxime Ripard]

The commit title is wrong, it's not a rockchip device.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 06:46:15PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> The DSI downstream devices are likely to be Panel, Bridge and
> I2C-Configured Bridge.
> 
> It is possible to connect all three devices using upstream OF-graph port
> or ports node however only Panel and Bridge are possible to connect via
> child node but not possible to connect I2C-Configured Bridge via child
> node since I2C-Configure bridges are child of I2C not upstream DSI hosts
> and it must represent them via port or ports with endpoint linking.
> 
> Allwinner A64 DSI node already has a port so add endpoint 0 for input
> tcon so that the downstream DSI devices can use endpoint 1 to connect
> Panel or Bridge or I2C-Configured Bridge.
> 
> An example of the I2C-Configured downstream bridge representation is,
> 
> i2c1 {
>        bridge at 1b {
> 	     compatible = "ti,dlpc3433";
> 
>              ports {
>                   port at 0 {
>                          reg = <0>;
> 
>                          bridge_in_dsi: endpoint {
>                                 remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out_bridge>;
>                                 data-lanes = <1 2 3 4>;
>                          };
>                   };
> 
> 	          port at 2 {
> 	                 reg = <2>;
> 
>                          bridge_out_dmd: endpoint {
>                                 remote-endpoint = <&dmd_out_bridge>;
>                          };
>                   };
>              };
>        };
> };
> 
> dsi {
>        compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dsi";
> 
>        port {
>              dsi_in_tcon0: endpoint at 0 {
> 	          reg = <0>;
> 		  remote-endpoint = <tcon0_out_dsi>;
> 	     };
> 
> 	     dsi_out_bridge: endpoint at 1 {
> 	   	  reg = <1>;
> 		  remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in_dsi>;
> 	     };
> 	};
> };
> 
> Note that existing device bindings are untouched and still represent
> the downstream devices via child nodes since the sun6i-mipi-dsi host
> will migrate to a standardized single helper to lookup for a
> downstream device via child or OF-graph port or port node.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> Changes for v7:
> - new patch
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index 77b5349f6087..3ed566dc2172 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -1189,7 +1189,11 @@ dsi: dsi at 1ca0000 {
>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>  
>  			port {
> -				dsi_in_tcon0: endpoint {
> +				#address-cells = <1>;
> +				#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +				dsi_in_tcon0: endpoint at 0 {
> +					reg = <0>;
>  					remote-endpoint = <&tcon0_out_dsi>;
>  				};

That doesn't match the DT binding anymore, and why can't we add endpoint at 1 there too?

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230329/642b530c/attachment.sig>