[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges

[Peng Fan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>
> Sent: 2023年3月28日 22:48
> To: Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan at oss.nxp.com>
> Cc: linus.walleij at linaro.org; brgl at bgdev.pl; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org; shawnguo at kernel.org;
> s.hauer at pengutronix.de; kernel at pengutronix.de; festevam at gmail.com;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>; stefan at agner.ch; linux-
> gpio at vger.kernel.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: update gpio-ranges
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:29:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> >
> > 1 is not enough for i.MX9, enlarge it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 3 ++-
> 
> I'm not that knowledgeable about i.MX9, but i thought vf610 was Vybrid,
> which is not an i.MX9. Does i.MX9 reuse the Vybrid GPIO controller? Is this
> change also valid for the Vybrid?
[Peng Fan] 

i.MX9 reuse the gpio-vf610 driver and yaml dtschema. There are some
minor differences from hardware level. The gpio-ranges will also impact
vybrid, but this may not matter.

Regards,
Peng.
> 
> 	Andrew