[RESEND PATCH v7 0/5] can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller
Marc Kleine-Budde
mkl at pengutronix.de
Mon Mar 27 00:51:06 PDT 2023
On 26.03.2023 18:07:14, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > On 21.03.2023 12:25:15, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > > A gentle ping to remind you of this series.
> > > I have no idea why it hasn't deserved any response for quite some
> > > time.
> > > Is there anything I am still missing?
> >
> > I wonder if we want to do a s/master/primary/ in the DT bindings and
> > driver?
>
> The ST reference manual (RM0386) explicitly uses the master and slave words
> in the bxcan chapter.
ACK
> I would stay consistent with it.
Yes, this is a known problem, on the one hand I'd like the drivers to
match the datasheet, but here I am in favor of a deviation.
> But I have no problem changing it to primary. I just sent v8 with the
> changes you suggested for shared irq and clock enable/disable,
These changes look good!
> but if you prefer to use primary I will send the v9 version with that
> change. Please let me know your opinion.
Please convert the driver and bindings to use "primary". Feel free to
mention that the datasheet calls the primary peripheral "master".
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230327/bb00398a/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list