[PATCH v2] iommu/rockchip: Add missing set_platform_dma_ops callback
Steven Price
steven.price at arm.com
Fri Mar 24 06:24:47 PDT 2023
On 24/03/2023 13:16, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 2023/3/24 19:11, Steven Price wrote:
>> Similar to exynos, we need a set_platform_dma_ops() callback for proper
>> operation on ARM 32 bit after recent changes in the IOMMU framework
>> (detach ops removal). But also the use of a NULL domain is confusing.
>>
>> Rework the code to have a singleton rk_identity_domain which is assigned
>> to domain when using an identity mapping rather than "detaching". This
>> makes the code easier to reason about.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price at arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1[1]:
>>
>> * Reworked the code to avoid a NULL domain, instead a singleton
>> rk_identity_domain is used instead. The 'detach' language is no
>> longer used.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230315164152.333251-1-steven.price%40arm.com
>>
>> drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> index f30db22ea5d7..437541004994 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct rk_iommudata {
>> static struct device *dma_dev;
>> static const struct rk_iommu_ops *rk_ops;
>> +static struct iommu_domain rk_identity_domain;
>> static inline void rk_table_flush(struct rk_iommu_domain *dom,
>> dma_addr_t dma,
>> unsigned int count)
>> @@ -980,26 +981,27 @@ static int rk_iommu_enable(struct rk_iommu *iommu)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -static void rk_iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> - struct device *dev)
>> +static int rk_iommu_identity_attach(struct iommu_domain
>> *identity_domain,
>> + struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct rk_iommu *iommu;
>> - struct rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain = to_rk_domain(domain);
>> + struct rk_iommu_domain *rk_domain;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> int ret;
>> /* Allow 'virtual devices' (eg drm) to detach from domain */
>> iommu = rk_iommu_from_dev(dev);
>> if (!iommu)
>> - return;
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + rk_domain = to_rk_domain(iommu->domain);
>> dev_dbg(dev, "Detaching from iommu domain\n");
>> - /* iommu already detached */
>> - if (iommu->domain != domain)
>> - return;
>> + if (iommu->domain == identity_domain)
>> + return 0;
>> - iommu->domain = NULL;
>> + iommu->domain = identity_domain;
>
> Where did identity_domain come from? Is it rk_identity_domain?
It's a parameter of the function. In the case of the call in
rk_iommu_attach_device() then, yes, it's rk_identity_domain. But this
function is also the "attach_dev" callback of "rk_identity_ops".
I'll admit this is cargo-culted from Jason's example:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/ZBnef7g7GCxogPNz@ziepe.ca/
Steve
> Best regards,
> baolu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list