[PATCH v7 6/6] PCI: Make use of pci_resource_n()
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 24 02:20:54 PDT 2023
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 23/3/23 18:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Replace open-coded implementations of pci_resource_n() in pci.h.
...
> > #define pci_resource_n(dev, bar) (&(dev)->resource[(bar)])
> > -#define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start)
> > -#define pci_resource_end(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].end)
> > -#define pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].flags)
> > -#define pci_resource_len(dev,bar) \
> > - ((pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) == 0) ? 0 : \
> > - \
> > - (pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) - \
> > - pci_resource_start((dev), (bar)) + 1))
> > +#define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->start)
> > +#define pci_resource_end(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->end)
> > +#define pci_resource_flags(dev, bar) (pci_resource_n(dev, bar)->flags)
> > +#define pci_resource_len(dev,bar) \
> > + (pci_resource_end((dev), (bar)) ? \
> > + resource_size(pci_resource_n((dev), (bar))) : 0)
>
> Seems (to me) more logical to have this patch as "PCI: Introduce
> pci_resource_n()" ordered before your patch #2 "PCI: Introduce
> pci_dev_for_each_resource()".
Either way works for me. Bjorn, what do you like?
> Here as #6 or as #2:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd at linaro.org>
Thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list